1975
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(75)80079-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Rapid Pull-Through Technique for Measuring Lower Esophageal Sphincter Pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0
5

Year Published

1976
1976
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
15
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…18 Interobserver variation has also been assessed in the evaluation of pull through techniques for the measurement of lower oesophageal sphincter pressure. 19,20 Interlaboratory differences have been noted in the analysis of ADM with respect to the identification of Ôlate phase IIIÕ of the MMC. 21 However, few studies have set out with the primary aim of assessing interobserver variability in the assessment of manometric data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…18 Interobserver variation has also been assessed in the evaluation of pull through techniques for the measurement of lower oesophageal sphincter pressure. 19,20 Interlaboratory differences have been noted in the analysis of ADM with respect to the identification of Ôlate phase IIIÕ of the MMC. 21 However, few studies have set out with the primary aim of assessing interobserver variability in the assessment of manometric data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inflammatory bowel disease 36 Histological diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease K = 0.47 Normal K = 0.43 Inflammatory bowel disease K = 0.2 CrohnÕs disease K = 0. 19 Non-specific inflammation Inflammatory bowel disease 37 Histological diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease K = 0.43 Normal K = 0.37…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evaluation of esophageal dysfunction. The methods we used have been described in detail previously (30)(31)(32). In summary, patients were evaluated in the fasting state and in a supine position, using a triple-lumen assembly (inside diameter of each lumen, 1.1 mm) with radially oriented side ports (diameter, 1 mm) spaced 5 cm apart.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For manometry, the catheter assembly was passed via the mouth. The LESP was recorded by the conventional station pull-through technique and by a rapid pull-through technique (31). The station pull-through technique consisted of withdrawal of the radial recording tips through the LES in 0.5-cm increments, with a pause of 20 seconds or longer at each station; we assessed resting LESP by measuring peak LESP at the pressure inversion point.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%