2006
DOI: 10.1051/m2an:2006036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A residual basedA POSTERIORIerror estimator for an augmented mixed finite element method in linear elasticity

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper we develop a residual based a posteriori error analysis for an augmented mixed finite element method applied to the problem of linear elasticity in the plane. More precisely, we derive a reliable and efficient a posteriori error estimator for the case of pure Dirichlet boundary conditions. In addition, several numerical experiments confirming the theoretical properties of the estimator, and illustrating the capability of the corresponding adaptive algorithm to localize the singularities… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

7
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof of (3.30) corresponds to a slight adaptation of the proof of [7,Lemma 4.6], which makes use of (3.29).…”
Section: Lemma 16 Let ζ H ∈ L 2 ( ) Be An Element-wise Polynomial Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof of (3.30) corresponds to a slight adaptation of the proof of [7,Lemma 4.6], which makes use of (3.29).…”
Section: Lemma 16 Let ζ H ∈ L 2 ( ) Be An Element-wise Polynomial Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the proof of (3.50) we refer to [7,Lemma 4.3], whereas (3.51) is a slight modification of the proof of [7,Lemma 4.4]. We omit further details.…”
Section: Lemma 316mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that no extra regularity assumptions on the data, but only f ∈ [L 2 (Ω s )] 2 and g ∈ H −1/2 (Γ ), are needed here. Theorem 3 Let ((σ , p), (ϕ, γ )) ∈ H × Q be the unique solution of (8) and let u ∈ [L 2 (Ω s )] 2 be defined according to (7).…”
Section: The Mixed Variational Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, let u and u h be defined according to (7) and (37), respectively, and suppose that the Robin datum g belongs to L 2 (Γ ). Also, assume that there exists c ≥ 1 such thath e ≤ c h e for each e ∈ E h (Σ).…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%