2006
DOI: 10.1109/emr.2006.261387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A retrospective look at our evolving understanding of project success

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
329
2
35

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 222 publications
(372 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
6
329
2
35
Order By: Relevance
“…Later, it was enhanced by considering stakeholder satisfaction and the strategic aspect of the client. This development required the consideration of the interrelationships among the components of the project success: the success criteria and the critical success factors [13]. Besides this triple criterion system, reference [14] discusses the alternative evaluation models such as the key performance indicator (KPI)-based or financial indicator-based, e.g., NPV or IRR evaluation models.…”
Section: Project Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, it was enhanced by considering stakeholder satisfaction and the strategic aspect of the client. This development required the consideration of the interrelationships among the components of the project success: the success criteria and the critical success factors [13]. Besides this triple criterion system, reference [14] discusses the alternative evaluation models such as the key performance indicator (KPI)-based or financial indicator-based, e.g., NPV or IRR evaluation models.…”
Section: Project Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baccarini's four levels are similar to Shenhar's four dimensions as shown in Table 1. (Jugdev & Müller 2005). These attitudes continue today and they comply more effectively with the multidimensional nature of projects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the 1990s, there was further development of the concept of project success. Researchers argued that project success should be understood according to frameworks consisting of different levels or dimensions (Jugdev &Müller 2005). Each level or dimension has its own criteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Além da evidente intersecção com o tema gerenciamento de projetos de TI, podemos enxergar ainda intersecções com os temas gestão do portfólio de TI, estrutura organizacional de TI e governança de TI. No tema gerenciamento de projetos, trabalhos sobre o sucesso em gerenciamento de projetos (DELONE; MCLEAN, 1992;MUNNS;BJEIRNI, 1996;BACCARINI, 1999;COOKE-DAVIES, 2002;JUGDEV;MÜLLER, 2005) são relevantes para o estudo de EP-TI, visto que um dos objetivos frequentemente buscado, quando se cria um EP, é aperfeiçoar o gerenciamento de projetos e reduzir o número de projetos problemáticos. Em especial, são relevantes estudos que pretendem avaliar o impacto do uso de processos padronizados e formais sobre o sucesso no gerenciamento dos projetos (JIANG; KLEIN;PICK, 2003;MILOSEVIC;PATANAKUL, 2005), uma vez que EP atuam no desenvolvimento de metodologias de gerenciamento de projetos.…”
Section: Uma Perspectiva Sobre Escritórios De Projetosunclassified