2005
DOI: 10.2190/7w71-qvt2-pap2-udx7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Retrospective on Twenty Years of Education Technology Policy

Abstract: This article provides an analysis of 20 years of key policy reports addressing the challenges and opportunities in integrating technology into K-12 education in the United States. It summarizes recommendations made in these reports, and comments on the shifting rationales for and expectations of educational technology investments that have shaped those recommendations. In undertaking this analysis, we have been guided by three key sets of questions: a) Why do we invest in educational technologies? What rationa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
134
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
134
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…As change agent it catalyses various other changes in the content, methods and overall quality of teaching and learning. [12] In order to conduct this research among the undergraduate students, the investigator has proposed following objectives. a.…”
Section: Solid Waste Management (Swm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As change agent it catalyses various other changes in the content, methods and overall quality of teaching and learning. [12] In order to conduct this research among the undergraduate students, the investigator has proposed following objectives. a.…”
Section: Solid Waste Management (Swm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two reasons identified in this study for such a situation were time issues and computer and software training issues. The "high access vs. low use" paradox are well-documented in technology integration research (Becker, 2001;Culp, Honey, & Mandinach, 2005;Ertmer, 2005;Palak & Walls, 2009). Valdez and his colleagues (2000) distinguished technology uses into three phases: Phase I of Print Automation, Phase II of Expansion of Learning Opportunities, and Phase III of Data-Driven Virtual Learning.…”
Section: Definition Of "What Integration Is Not"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esses obstáculos à integração das TD têm sido o foco de vários estudos nos últimos anos. Em diversos trabalhos científicos foram já apresentados obstáculos de diversa ordem, sendo em todos eles a falta de formação de professores apontada como um dos principais fatores inibidores, tanto em contexto nacional como internacional (Bravo & Fernández, 2009;Costa, 2008;Culp, Honey, & Mandinach, 2003;Miranda, 2007;Norris, Soloway, & Sullivan, 2002). Assim, vários autores confirmam que, com vista a implementar uma real e efetiva integração educativa das tecnologias, o desenvolvimento de competências tecnológicas por parte dos profissionais da educação deverá ser um dos principais aspetos a garantir (Gooler, Kautzer, & Knuth, 2000;Ivers, 2002;Liu & Huang, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified