2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A retrospective review of oral cephalosporins versus fluoroquinolones for the treatment of pyelonephritis

Abstract: Background The current Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines for the treatment of acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis (AUP) advise caution when using oral beta-lactams due to concern for potentially inferior efficacy compared to fluoroquinolones (FQs) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; however, studies specifically evaluating the efficacy of oral cephalosporins (CPs) in AUP are limited. Objective To assess the safety and efficacy of oral CPs versus FQs for the treatment of AUP. Design, setting a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 6 Fewer treatment failures have been observed with C2Gs compared with first- and third-generation cephalosporins. 7 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 6 Fewer treatment failures have been observed with C2Gs compared with first- and third-generation cephalosporins. 7 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%