2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A retrospective study of COVID during pregnancy and the outcome of vaginal delivery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there was no significant difference in neonatal outcomes between the group delivered by vaginal delivery and the group delivered by cesarean section. 18 This correlates with the findings of this systematic review and suggests that DMI proposed early in the pandemic should be specifically reviewed and guidelines for delivery adjusted accordingly.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there was no significant difference in neonatal outcomes between the group delivered by vaginal delivery and the group delivered by cesarean section. 18 This correlates with the findings of this systematic review and suggests that DMI proposed early in the pandemic should be specifically reviewed and guidelines for delivery adjusted accordingly.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…17 Sunuwar et al described a small retrospective review of 104 women who were SARS-CoV-2-positive during any trimester of pregnancy and delivered by vaginal delivery or cesarean section and followed their neonatal outcomes. 18 They found that in their infants 51% were born with low Apgar scores, 18% were born prematurely, 19% had low birth weight, 7% required neonatal intensive care unit admission, 3% experienced neonatal asphyxia, 2% died, and none were SARS-CoV-2-positive. However, there was no significant difference in neonatal outcomes between the group delivered by vaginal delivery and the group delivered by cesarean section.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were no miscarriages or congenital anomalies in our study population. Other studies from Nepal during the pandemic time also had similar findings 15 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%