2024
DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A retrospective study on the investigation of potential dosimetric benefits of online adaptive proton therapy for head and neck cancer

Chih‐Wei Chang,
Duncan Bohannon,
Zhen Tian
et al.

Abstract: PurposeProton therapy is sensitive to anatomical changes, often occurring in head‐and‐neck (HN) cancer patients. Although multiple studies have proposed online adaptive proton therapy (APT), there is still a concern in the radiotherapy community about the necessity of online APT. We have performed a retrospective study to investigate the potential dosimetric benefits of online APT for HN patients relative to the current offline APT.MethodsOur retrospective study has a patient cohort of 10 cases. To mimic onlin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the anthropomorphic phantom, which allows internal anatomical variations only within the nasal cavity, the choice of beam angles was deliberate as we aimed to measure the effect of these variations on the delivered dose. Furthermore, with a daily online adaptive approach, there exists flexibility to deviate from standard field arrangements in favor of fields that reduce the integral dose to the normal tissue (Nenoff et al 2021) and to reduce setup margins compared to standard non-adaptive treatment (Bobić et al 2023, Chang et al 2024.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the anthropomorphic phantom, which allows internal anatomical variations only within the nasal cavity, the choice of beam angles was deliberate as we aimed to measure the effect of these variations on the delivered dose. Furthermore, with a daily online adaptive approach, there exists flexibility to deviate from standard field arrangements in favor of fields that reduce the integral dose to the normal tissue (Nenoff et al 2021) and to reduce setup margins compared to standard non-adaptive treatment (Bobić et al 2023, Chang et al 2024.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%