2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12308-014-0198-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of AML classification: a single institution experience in a developing country

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before the publication of the fifth edition of the WHO classification, the FAB classification was still widely used in many countries due to a lack of funding and limited access to genetic analysis equipment [ 6 ]. However, the most recent WHO classification considers both differentiation patterns and genetic aberrations, combining the fourth WHO and FAB classifications and thus making it more accurate.…”
Section: Who Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the publication of the fifth edition of the WHO classification, the FAB classification was still widely used in many countries due to a lack of funding and limited access to genetic analysis equipment [ 6 ]. However, the most recent WHO classification considers both differentiation patterns and genetic aberrations, combining the fourth WHO and FAB classifications and thus making it more accurate.…”
Section: Who Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of AML conducted by [15] uses Canny edge detector for extraction of nucleus. This edge detector follows by [16] which uses Canny for searching nucleus boundary and also cytoplasm for segmentation in cervical cancer detection.…”
Section: M0mentioning
confidence: 99%