2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of data collection and analysis requirements for certified green buildings

Abstract: Highlights The review of literature highlights performance gap in certified buildings. The presented comparative analysis shows differences across certification systems. This survey shows major discrepancies in data infrastructure requirements.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…81 Other building certifications such as BREEAM, BOMA Best 3, Green Globes EB, and Well v2 promote operational data collection by specifying it as a prerequisite or by granting credits for implementation. 82 However, these requirements do not apply to existing buildings (i.e., the majority of the building stock), which continue to rely largely on bulk metering of energy resulting in missed opportunities to address operational issues that might affect energy use and occupants' comfort.…”
Section: Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…81 Other building certifications such as BREEAM, BOMA Best 3, Green Globes EB, and Well v2 promote operational data collection by specifying it as a prerequisite or by granting credits for implementation. 82 However, these requirements do not apply to existing buildings (i.e., the majority of the building stock), which continue to rely largely on bulk metering of energy resulting in missed opportunities to address operational issues that might affect energy use and occupants' comfort.…”
Section: Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rating systems have traditionally responded to these factors with flexibility, assigning these criteria to optional credits, instead of prerequisites. A few systems require demanding performance verification in operation, yet even in these cases established protocols are often sporadic (Afroz et al 2020). For example, WELL v2 and BEAM Plus (Hong Kong) require occasional performance testing once every three and five years, respectively (WELL 2021).…”
Section: Performance Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New players on the market increasingly create their own monitoring programmes and select elements that suit them best. This creates discrepancies in protocols and data infrastructure requirements across rating systems that limit comparability (Afroz et al 2020) and the creation of benchmarks.…”
Section: Performance Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, errors, including missing and incorrect values, can still be made by humans and machines. Thus, investing in data infrastructures such as sensors, meters, sub-meters and data archiving systems and linking these to data-driven building operation applications are still essential [30].…”
Section: Collecting Energy Performance Datamentioning
confidence: 99%