2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2002.00340.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of recent randomized trials in colorectal disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several SRs and meta-analyses which evaluated the comparative effects of EIN versus standard EN have been published. 8 , 25 , 26 , 46 48 In addition, of these six SRs, two systematically assessed the direct evidences between preoperative or postoperative versus perioperative EIN methods. 8 , 26 However, it is noted that these SRs and meta-analyses were performed by using traditional pair-wise meta-analysis method which cannot compare >2 treatments concerning certain topic simultaneously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several SRs and meta-analyses which evaluated the comparative effects of EIN versus standard EN have been published. 8 , 25 , 26 , 46 48 In addition, of these six SRs, two systematically assessed the direct evidences between preoperative or postoperative versus perioperative EIN methods. 8 , 26 However, it is noted that these SRs and meta-analyses were performed by using traditional pair-wise meta-analysis method which cannot compare >2 treatments concerning certain topic simultaneously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%