2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrtpm.2022.100312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of train delay prediction approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Carvalho et al (2021), RF, SVM, ANN and k-nearest neighbors (KNN) are the most frequently used algorithms to address airfreight delay and were also adopted in this study. Spanninger et al (2022) identified RF, SVM and ANN as the main data-driven classification techniques to predict transportation delay, producing single-value deterministic outputs. The nature of the delays defined by the deterministic approach according to Spanninger et al (2022) is that it "does not convey any information about their (un)certainty and ignore (or drastically simplify) the random occurrence of disturbances in the prediction horizon" as stochastic methods would perform.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Carvalho et al (2021), RF, SVM, ANN and k-nearest neighbors (KNN) are the most frequently used algorithms to address airfreight delay and were also adopted in this study. Spanninger et al (2022) identified RF, SVM and ANN as the main data-driven classification techniques to predict transportation delay, producing single-value deterministic outputs. The nature of the delays defined by the deterministic approach according to Spanninger et al (2022) is that it "does not convey any information about their (un)certainty and ignore (or drastically simplify) the random occurrence of disturbances in the prediction horizon" as stochastic methods would perform.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spanninger et al (2022) identified RF, SVM and ANN as the main data-driven classification techniques to predict transportation delay, producing single-value deterministic outputs. The nature of the delays defined by the deterministic approach according to Spanninger et al (2022) is that it "does not convey any information about their (un)certainty and ignore (or drastically simplify) the random occurrence of disturbances in the prediction horizon" as stochastic methods would perform. Due to the high predictive power, machine learning data-driven methods are one of the main techniques adopted in transportation delay.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Spanninger et al (2022), data-driven train delay predictions are based on a direct prediction of delays at the desired station or point in time rather than explicit modeling of train-event dependency structure to capture traffic flow dynamics. Kecman and Goverde (2015) broadly categorised datadriven train delay models into global and local models.…”
Section: Modeling Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the prediction duration, prediction can be divided into two categories: short-term prediction (0-30 min) and long-term prediction (>30 min) [2]. The problem is an event-driven predictions based on graph [34], and the network has typical characteristics such as spatiotemporal dependence, complexity, and community, which has become a bottleneck restricting the current high-speed train delay prediction. This bottleneck is mainly reflected in the following aspects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%