2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on dynamic membrane filtration: Materials, applications and future perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
155
1
10

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 346 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
155
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, post-treatment to remove residual N is required in AnMBR systems. However, anaerobic dynamic MBR which relies on the formation of a cake layer on the mesh or fabric supporting material for the separation of solids from the liquid (Ersahin et al 2012), offers the advantage of lower cost and high membrane flux but its application for the treatment of leachate remains very limited (Xie et al 2014). Under thermophilic conditions, the use of membranes to separate microorganisms from the treated effluent permitted the preservation of the advantages of thermophilic treatment (low sludge yield, rapid biodegradation, rapid inactivation of pathogenic microorganisms, high loading rates, low retention time) without compromising the effluent quality due to poor settling properties resulting from high temperatures (Krishna and Van Loosdrecht 1999).…”
Section: Variations In Mbr Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, post-treatment to remove residual N is required in AnMBR systems. However, anaerobic dynamic MBR which relies on the formation of a cake layer on the mesh or fabric supporting material for the separation of solids from the liquid (Ersahin et al 2012), offers the advantage of lower cost and high membrane flux but its application for the treatment of leachate remains very limited (Xie et al 2014). Under thermophilic conditions, the use of membranes to separate microorganisms from the treated effluent permitted the preservation of the advantages of thermophilic treatment (low sludge yield, rapid biodegradation, rapid inactivation of pathogenic microorganisms, high loading rates, low retention time) without compromising the effluent quality due to poor settling properties resulting from high temperatures (Krishna and Van Loosdrecht 1999).…”
Section: Variations In Mbr Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As exemplified, studies on the use of the dynamic forming method for the preparation of low-fouling membranes 10 12) , in oil/water separation systems 13) , in the food industry 14) , and in membrane bioreactors 15,16) were reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the permeate flux of traditional membrane separation decreases rapidly with time due to membrane fouling and concentration polarization. Therefore, several physicochemical methods have been developed to mitigate membrane fouling and enhance filtration such as adding reactive salts (Belkacem et al, 1995), coagulation/flocculation pretreatment (Zhong et al, 2003) and dynamic shear enhanced processes, i.e., rotating membranes and vibratory shear enhancing process (VSEP) (Ersahin et al, 2012;Jaffrin, 2008;Zhang et al, 2013). According to the report of Belkacem et al, the membrane flux was greatly enhanced by adding low dosage of inorganic salt.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%