2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on multi attribute decision making for evaluation and selection of supplier for materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking impartial information into consideration during the decision-making process clearly affects the outcome (Abdel-Basset et al, 2020). A similar issue may be observed in the problem of supplier selection: fuzzy Analytic Hierarchal Process (AHP) (Ho et al, 2021), fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) (Kannan et al, 2014), fuzzy Adaptive Resonance Theory (ART) algorithm (Sivanagaraju et al, 2021), fuzzy Vise Kriterijumsa Optimizacija I Ensuring healthy and safe service in order to stay competitive amid pandemic while creating value for themselves and the customers in general is crucial and emerging technology can surely help here Tamers et al (2020) Note: A = code of expressing attributes.…”
Section: Existing Methods and Contributions Of Our Studymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Taking impartial information into consideration during the decision-making process clearly affects the outcome (Abdel-Basset et al, 2020). A similar issue may be observed in the problem of supplier selection: fuzzy Analytic Hierarchal Process (AHP) (Ho et al, 2021), fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) (Kannan et al, 2014), fuzzy Adaptive Resonance Theory (ART) algorithm (Sivanagaraju et al, 2021), fuzzy Vise Kriterijumsa Optimizacija I Ensuring healthy and safe service in order to stay competitive amid pandemic while creating value for themselves and the customers in general is crucial and emerging technology can surely help here Tamers et al (2020) Note: A = code of expressing attributes.…”
Section: Existing Methods and Contributions Of Our Studymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The Support Vector Machine (SVM) was applied to extract the core criteria from a firm's historical supplier performance data, then the Fuzzy Best Worst Method (FBWM) was used to calculate the weights of the criteria, and the fuzzy TOPSIS was finally adopted to select the most suitable green suppliers. Pitchaiah et al [37] reviewed past works regarding the evaluation and selection of suppliers for materials using MADM. Some commonly used methodologies include DEA, AHP, Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique (SMART).…”
Section: New Product Development (Npd) Technology Selection and Suppl...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…it is used to measure the degree of change of suppliers' supply quantity. The formula is as follows: (2) Where: represent the coefficient of variation of the weekly supply quantity of the supplier;…”
Section: Coefficient Of Variation Of Weekly Supplymentioning
confidence: 99%