A Revised KDD Procedure for the Modeling of Continuous Production in Powder Processing

Vernickel, Kilian; Weber, Jean-Philippe; Li, X.; Berg, Julia; Reinhart, Gunther

doi:10.1109/ieem44572.2019.8978828

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Two of the workflows in this category were based on CRISP-DM and were specialized for sequence analysis ( Kalgotra & Sharda, 2016 ) or anomaly detection ( Schwenzfeier & Gruhn, 2018 ). In addition, a revised KDD procedure model for time-series data was proposed in Vernickel et al (2019) .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Current approaches for executing big data science projects—a systematic literature review

Saltz

Krasteva

2022

PeerJ Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is an increasing number of big data science projects aiming to create value for organizations by improving decision making, streamlining costs or enhancing business processes. However, many of these projects fail to deliver the expected value. It has been observed that a key reason many data science projects don’t succeed is not technical in nature, but rather, the process aspect of the project. The lack of established and mature methodologies for executing data science projects has been frequently noted as a reason for these project failures. To help move the field forward, this study presents a systematic review of research focused on the adoption of big data science process frameworks. The goal of the review was to identify (1) the key themes, with respect to current research on how teams execute data science projects, (2) the most common approaches regarding how data science projects are organized, managed and coordinated, (3) the activities involved in a data science projects life cycle, and (4) the implications for future research in this field. In short, the review identified 68 primary studies thematically classified in six categories. Two of the themes (workflow and agility) accounted for approximately 80% of the identified studies. The findings regarding workflow approaches consist mainly of adaptations to CRISP-DM (vs entirely new proposed methodologies). With respect to agile approaches, most of the studies only explored the conceptual benefits of using an agile approach in a data science project (vs actually evaluating an agile framework being used in a data science context). Hence, one finding from this research is that future research should explore how to best achieve the theorized benefits of agility. Another finding is the need to explore how to efficiently combine workflow and agile frameworks within a data science context to achieve a more comprehensive approach for project execution.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%