2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2023.01.085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Risk Assessment Framework for Critical Infrastructure Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To ensure the scienti city and accuracy of the evaluation of FA harmless disposal and resource utilization technology, a comprehensive grading of various indicators is required, with optimization of key test indicators during the veri cation and evaluation phase. The construction of the system adopts the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), a methodology that simpli es various factors in a complex problem into ordered hierarchies, effectively combining data, expert opinions, and the objective judgment of analysts (Fioravanti et al, 2022). Through the analysis of various indicators and the determination of the relative importance of each indicator, decision-makers can capture subjective and objective viewpoints on relevant issues based on multiple criteria and sub-criteria (Kumar and Pant, 2023).…”
Section: Determination Of Indicator Weightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure the scienti city and accuracy of the evaluation of FA harmless disposal and resource utilization technology, a comprehensive grading of various indicators is required, with optimization of key test indicators during the veri cation and evaluation phase. The construction of the system adopts the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), a methodology that simpli es various factors in a complex problem into ordered hierarchies, effectively combining data, expert opinions, and the objective judgment of analysts (Fioravanti et al, 2022). Through the analysis of various indicators and the determination of the relative importance of each indicator, decision-makers can capture subjective and objective viewpoints on relevant issues based on multiple criteria and sub-criteria (Kumar and Pant, 2023).…”
Section: Determination Of Indicator Weightsmentioning
confidence: 99%