2014
DOI: 10.5942/jawwa.2014.106.0034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A risk‐based methodology for contaminant prioritization

Abstract: Water utilities must continuously ensure safe drinking water within the context of multiple competing objectives and considerable uncertainty. Systematic, transparent prioritization of contaminants can improve utility decision‐making. A methodology was developed to identify, screen, evaluate, and determine appropriate actions for a wide range of contaminants, including regulated parameters, contaminants of emerging concern, and aesthetic issues. Actions were assigned on the basis of “utility risk,” defined as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Os valores dos critérios e do preenchimento do formulário FMEA foram definidos por um consenso da equipe, que, por meio de reuniões de brainstorm, discutiu os conhecimentos sobre o SAA de Campina Grande, baseando as decisões em atributos qualitativos e subjetivos, conforme recomenda a literatura do método (SPIESMAN & SPEIGHT, 2014;STAMATIS, 2003;TOLEDO & AMARAL, 2006;VIANA, 2011).…”
Section: Materiais E Métodosunclassified
“…Os valores dos critérios e do preenchimento do formulário FMEA foram definidos por um consenso da equipe, que, por meio de reuniões de brainstorm, discutiu os conhecimentos sobre o SAA de Campina Grande, baseando as decisões em atributos qualitativos e subjetivos, conforme recomenda a literatura do método (SPIESMAN & SPEIGHT, 2014;STAMATIS, 2003;TOLEDO & AMARAL, 2006;VIANA, 2011).…”
Section: Materiais E Métodosunclassified
“…To fulfill the public's trust that utilities will serve as good stewards of ratepayer resources requires thoughtful prioritization. With the help of a modern expert panel, Washington Aqueduct has developed a systematic, transparent, risk‐based methodology for prioritizing contaminants (Spiesman & Speight 2014) to guide investments in treatment upgrades, watershed protection programs, and distribution system improvements.…”
Section: The Modern Washington Aqueductmentioning
confidence: 99%