2014
DOI: 10.5829/idosi.ije.2014.27.04a.09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Robust Model for a Dynamic Cellular Manufacturing System with Production Planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Production planning is a novel topic studied by many researchers for different industries [8][9][10]. Many studies in the literature assume that in the planning period, demand is constant.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Production planning is a novel topic studied by many researchers for different industries [8][9][10]. Many studies in the literature assume that in the planning period, demand is constant.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective function (2) minimizes the total number of displacement machines in the reactive plan as compared to that in the initial plan. Constraints (3) and (4) show that the completion times of operations, the processing of which has started before the occurrence of the disturbance, do not change in the reactive plan. Constraint (5) indicates that each machine should be allocated maximally to one cell.…”
Section: Problem Statement and Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the important benefits of CMSs are that they can simplify and reduce material transportation, reduce material flow in manufacturing, reduce setup and production time and costs, improve production control, and increase flexibility. The process of CMS design consists of four main steps: (1) cell formation (CF) (e.g., Sakhaii et al [3] and Soolaki and Arkat [4]), (2) cellular layout (e.g., Arkat et al [5] and Rahimi et al [6]), (3) cellular scheduling (Arkat and Ghahve [7]), and (4) resource assignment (e.g., Mehdizadeh and Rahimi [8] and Bagheri et al [9]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%