A rotating beam‐blocker method for cone beam CT scatter correction

Abstract

BackgroundCone beam CT (CBCT) is widely utilized in clinics. However, the scatter artifact degrades the CBCT image quality, hampering the expansion of CBCT applications. Recently, beam‐blocker methods have been used for CBCT scatter correction and proved their high cost‐effectiveness.PurposeA rotating beam‐blocker (RBB) method for CBCT scatter correction was proposed to complete scatter correction and image reconstruction within a single scan in both full‐ and half‐fan scan scenarios.MethodsThe RBB consisted of two open regions and two blocked regions, and was designed as a centrosymmetric structure. The open and blocked projections could be alternatively obtained within one single rotation. The open projections were corrected with the scatter signal calculated from the blocked projections, and then used to reconstruct the 3D image via the Feldkamp‐Davis‐Kress algorithm. The performance of the RBB method was evaluated on head and pelvis phantoms in scenarios with and without a bowtie filter. The images obtained from nine repeated scans in each scenario were used to calculate the evaluation metrics including the CT number error, spatial nonuniformity (SNU) and contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR).ResultsFor the head phantom, the CT number error was decreased to <5 after scatter correction from >200 HU before correction when scanned without a bowtie filter, and to <4 from >160 HU when scanned with a full bowtie filter. For the pelvis phantom, the CT number error was reduced to <12 after scatter correction from >250 HU before correction when scanned without a bowtie filter, and to <10 from >190 HU when scanned with a half bowtie filter. After scatter correction, the uniformity and contrast were both improved, resulting in an SNU of >79% decrease and CNR of >2 times increase, respectively.ConclusionsHigh‐quality CBCT images could be obtained in a single scan after using the proposed RBB method for scatter correction, enabling more accurate image guidance for surgery and radiation therapy applications. With almost no time delay between the successive open and blocked projections, the RBB method could eliminate the motion‐induced anatomical mismatches between the corresponding open and blocked projections and could find particular usefulness in thoracic and abdominal imaging.