A satisficing approach to free flight

Johnson, Franklin; Hill, J.C.; Archibald, James K.; Frost, R.L.; Stirling, Wynn C.

doi:10.1109/icnsc.2005.1461173

Cited by 11 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Stirling's intrinsic rationality theory (Stirling, 2003), which adopts some hypotheses in the VNM axiom system, is consistent with the classical rationality theory and is presently regarded as one of important achievements about bounded rationalities. By use of this theory, Stirling and other scholars studied and discussed a satisficing game and its applications (Johnson et al, 2005). Starting with bounded rationalities caused by simplifications, memories, cognitive abilities and interactive decision making (Rubinstein, 1998), Rubinstein made some attempts to model decisions based on axiomatic hypothesis and gained some valuable achievements.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Retracted: Intrinsic Preferences, Revealed Preferences and Bounded Rational Decisions

Zhao

2012

Syst. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The following article from Systems Research and Behavioral Science “Intrinsic Preferences, Revealed Preferences and Bounded Rational Decisions” by Zhao Yong and Wu Xinlin, published online on 26 June 2012 in Wiley Online Library (http://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com; DOI: ), has been retracted by agreement between the authors, the journal editor, M.C. Jackson, and John Wiley & Sons. The retraction has been agreed due to unauthorized usage of material previously written by Dr Christopher J. Tyson of Queen Mary, University of London.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Retracted: Intrinsic Preferences, Revealed Preferences and Bounded Rational Decisions

Zhao

2012

Syst. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This space is an attractive candidate for automation because it does not require rigid scheduling and be-cause aircraft density is lower than in the airspace immediately surrounding airports. As in preliminary versions of this research [5]- [7], we assume that each aircraft is aware of critical information (e.g., position, velocity, and destination) pertaining to each aircraft within a given communication radius. To allow comparison of our approach with previously published studies, we adopt a commonly employed 2-D model of airspace in which all aircraft fly at the same altitude and at constant speed.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Satisficing Approach to Aircraft Conflict Resolution

Archibald

Hill

Jepsen

et al. 2008

IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. C

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Future generations of air traffic management systems may give appropriately equipped aircraft the freedom to change flight paths in real time. This would require a conflict avoidance and resolution scheme that is both decentralized and cooperative. We describe a multiagent solution to aircraft conflict resolution based on satisficing game theory. A key feature of the theory is that satisficing decision makers form their preferences by taking into consideration the preferences of others, unlike conventional game theory that models agents that maximize self-interest metrics. This makes possible situational altruism, a sophisticated form of unselfish behavior in which the preferences of another agent are accommodated provided that the other agent will actually take advantage of the sacrifice. This approach also makes possible the creation of groups in which every decision maker receives due consideration. We present simulation results from a variety of scenarios in which the aircraft are limited to constant-speed headingchange maneuvers to avoid conflicts. We show that the satisficing approach results in behavior that is attractive both in terms of safety and performance. The results underscore the applicability of satisficing game theory to multiagent problems in which selfinterested participants are inclined to cooperation.

show abstract

“…Cooperative path planning via mixed integer linear programming is a popular non-dynamical systems approach [89,94]. Various other approaches begin to make some connections between an optimal return type function for decisions and a team metric akin to a CLF, for assignment type problems: satisficing approaches [85,77,24,20,38], Lyapunov functionals [35], Lyapunov certificates [101], probability of loss [9], behavior-based approaches [92,3], consensus approaches [75,88], biologically inspired strategies [29,59], and auction methods [30]. The unification of vehicle dynamics and real-time cooperative path planning and assignment remains a difficult challenge.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Agent-Based Cooperative Control

Barth¹

2005

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS.

show abstract

A satisficing approach to free flight

Cited by 11 publications

References 5 publications

Retracted: Intrinsic Preferences, Revealed Preferences and Bounded Rational Decisions

Retracted: Intrinsic Preferences, Revealed Preferences and Bounded Rational Decisions

A Satisficing Approach to Aircraft Conflict Resolution

Agent-Based Cooperative Control

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About