2015 3rd International Conference on New Media (CONMEDIA) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/conmedia.2015.7449148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A scalable and configurable Multiprocessor System-on-Chip (MPSoC) virtual platform for hardware and software co-design and co-verification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This SDR platform has highlighted one of vast possibilities offered by the RUMPS401 as a low-power MPSoC on complex applications and serves as a proof of the first-time success Application Specific Integrated Circuits -Technologies, Digital Systems and Design Methodologies ASIC design methodology embraced by UTAR VLSI Research Center. Another example of RUMPS401 application is AES encryption as presented in [17]. The AES application has been successfully tested on the virtual prototyping platform and the RUMPS401 chip.…”
Section: Software-defined Radiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This SDR platform has highlighted one of vast possibilities offered by the RUMPS401 as a low-power MPSoC on complex applications and serves as a proof of the first-time success Application Specific Integrated Circuits -Technologies, Digital Systems and Design Methodologies ASIC design methodology embraced by UTAR VLSI Research Center. Another example of RUMPS401 application is AES encryption as presented in [17]. The AES application has been successfully tested on the virtual prototyping platform and the RUMPS401 chip.…”
Section: Software-defined Radiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, this paper proposes the implementation of Shor's quantum algorithm using the ProjectQ framework. The performance of the implementation is evaluated on two different hardware and measured by the execution time (user time) [16], [17]. The results are compared with implementation done by the Quantum Computing Playground and implementation done by the ProjectQ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is done to derive information on how the performance of the implementation would be differ between the two computers, since the execution of the implementation is carried out using a quantum simulator [10]. The performance results are measured by the execution time, specifically the user time [11], [12]. The result is compared with QCP's implementation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%