2014
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/148/3/41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A SEARCH FOR SUPERNOVA REMNANTS IN NGC 6946 USING THE [Fe II] 1.64 μm LINE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…J84.906182-69.769472 is one of three sources that shows [Fe ii] 1.64 µm emission. Near-IR [Fe ii] emission is often assumed to be shock excited as it is seen in protostellar jets and supernova remnants (e.g., Giannini et al 2013;Bruursema et al 2014). However, significant FUV radiation in H ii regions may allow photoexcitation to dominate (e.g., Mouri et al 2000).…”
Section: Ysos In N159mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…J84.906182-69.769472 is one of three sources that shows [Fe ii] 1.64 µm emission. Near-IR [Fe ii] emission is often assumed to be shock excited as it is seen in protostellar jets and supernova remnants (e.g., Giannini et al 2013;Bruursema et al 2014). However, significant FUV radiation in H ii regions may allow photoexcitation to dominate (e.g., Mouri et al 2000).…”
Section: Ysos In N159mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Near-IR [Fe ii] emission lines are often assumed to be collisionally-excited in shocks given their prevalence in protostellar jets and supernova remnants (e.g., Hollenbach & McKee 1989;Morel et al 2002;Giannini et al 2013;Bruursema et al 2014). However, as with H 2 , in H ii regions where significant FUV radiation permeates the region, [Fe ii] may be photoexcited.…”
Section: [Fe Ii]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 1D spectrum of Spot A in Slit 2 is shown inFigure 9. .-[Fe II] 1.644 µm luminosity of Galactic and extragalactic SNRs: Galactic SNRs (this paper), LMC SNRs(Oliva et al 1989), M33 SNRs(Morel et al 2002), NGC 1569 and NGC 5253 SNRs(Labrie & Pritchet 2006), NGC 6946 SNRs(Bruursema et al 2014), and M82 and NGC 253 SNRs (Alonso-Herrero et al 2003). For M82 and NGC 253, the upper and lower luminosities are presented.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In any case, the elliptical ring is not a young supernova remnant, because there is no [Fe II] or X-ray emission, as follows from the data shown by Bruursema et al (2014). The Red Ellipse is ten times larger and much brighter than the MF 16, and this fact alone casts strong doubt on the identification of the Red Ellipse as a SNR.…”
Section: Archival Direct Imagingmentioning
confidence: 91%