A second VrPGIP1 allele is associated with bruchid resistance (Callosobruchus spp.) in wild mungbean (Vigna radiata var. sublobata) accession ACC41

Kaewwongwal, Anochar; Somta, Prakit; Chen, Jingbin; Tian, Jichun; Yuan, Xuesong; Chen, Xin

doi:10.1007/s00438-019-01619-y

Cited by 19 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Recent evidence suggests that herbivorous insects also express PGs, and that PGIPs may protect plants from leaf-feeding insects as well (Haeger et al, 2020). Intriguingly, the PGIP-containing C. maculatus resistance QTL maps to 14.8-15.1 cM on chromosome 5 of the mung bean genome (Kaewwongwal et al, 2020) (for additional evidence that mung bean chromosome 5 underlies bruchid resistance, see Schafleitner et al, 2016). However, despite high overall synteny between mung bean and cowpea genomes (Lonardi et al, 2019a), we find no direct evidence of PGIPs on chromosome 5 in cowpea.…”

Section: Genomic Basis Of Cowpea Resistancecontrasting

confidence: 58%

“…In mung bean (V. radiata), a close relative to cowpea, multiple recent studies have suggested that resistance to C. maculatus is mostly determined by a single major QTL (Chotechung et al, 2016;Kaewwongwal et al, 2017Kaewwongwal et al, , 2020. This QTL harbors genes for two polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins (PGIPs) (Kaewwongwal et al, 2017).…”

Section: Genomic Basis Of Cowpea Resistancementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Disparate genetic variants associated with distinct components of cowpea resistance to the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Genomic Basis Of Cowpea Resistancecontrasting

confidence: 58%

Section: Genomic Basis Of Cowpea Resistancementioning

confidence: 99%

Disparate genetic variants associated with distinct components of cowpea resistance to the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In mung bean (Vigna radiata), resistance to seed beetles (Callosobruchus spp.) was associated withgenes encoding putative PGIPs (76,77).Feeding assaysonA.thalianarevealedthefirstecological relevance of PGIPs for herbivorous beetles, as the fitness of P. cochleariaecorrelatedwiththePGIP compositionofthediet (78).…”

Section: Plant Pgips May Play a Role In The Defense Against Herbivorous Beetlesmentioning

confidence: 90%

Direct evidence for a new mode of plant defense against insects via a novel polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein expression strategy

Haeger

Henning

Heckel

et al. 2020

Journal of Biological Chemistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Plant cell wall-associated polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins (PGIPs) are widely distributed in the plant kingdom. They play a crucial role in plant defense against phytopathogens by inhibiting microbial polygalacturonases (PGs). PGs hydrolyze the cell wall polysaccharide pectin and are among the first enzymes to be secreted during plant infection. Recent studies demonstrated that herbivorous insects express their own PG multi-gene families, raising the question whether PGIPs also inhibit insect PGs and protect plants from herbivores. Preliminary evidence suggested that PGIPs may negatively influence larval growth of the leaf beetle Phaedon cochleariae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and identified BrPGIP3 from Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis) as a candidate. PGIPs are predominantly studied in planta because their heterologous expression in microbial systems is problematic and instability and aggregation of recombinant PGIPs has complicated in vitro inhibition assays. To minimize aggregate formation, we heterologously expressed BrPGIP3 fused to a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) membrane anchor, immobilizing it on the extracellular surface of insect cells. We demonstrated that BrPGIP3_GPI inhibited several P. cochleariae PGs in vitro, providing the first direct evidence of an interaction between a plant PGIP and an animal PG. Thus, plant PGIPs not only confer resistance against phytopathogens, but may also aid in defense against herbivorous beetles.

show abstract

“…There are various varieties of pulse seeds (chick pea, green gram, black gram etc. )which shows resistance against Callosobruchus ( Swamy et al., 2019 ; Kaewwongwal et al., 2020 ). Various other authors also evaluated the resistance cultivars of pulses which is resistance to the infestation of C. maculatus .…”

Section: Modern Pest Management Approaches ( Table 2 )mentioning

confidence: 99%

Management of stored grain pest with special reference to Callosobruchus maculatus, a major pest of cowpea: A review

Kalpna

Hajam

Kumar

2022

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bruchids are most pernicious pest of stored grain pulses, especially in the tropical and subtropical areas. They penetrate into the fully grown matured pods, grains in fields and also during post-harvest storage. Among bruchids, Callosobruchus maculatus is the prominent pest having ubiquitous distribution. Chemical/synthetic insecticides provides adequate control against the C. maculatus on the pulses. However, the use of synthetic insecticides induces adverse health outcomes in agricultural workers and many causes various diseases such as cancers, genomic damage, oxidative stress, neurological disorders and respiratory, metabolic and thyroid effects. Therefore, alternative effective, safe and sustainable pest control, integration of different compatible methods should be taken into considerations. One of the possible managements might be use of traditional as well modern pest management practices. Traditional techniques include sealed containers, inert materials, harvesting time, alternate host, intercropping, storing un-threshed pulses, cleanliness, vegetable oil etc. Modern techniques such as temperature, freezing and heating, radiation treatments, resistance varieties, natural control, botanical extracts, chemical and microbial, transgenic approach, cold plasma treatments etc. thus integrated pest management might be alternative approach to combat the effect of pest. Therefore, present review aims to considers various measures for the handling of bruchids with special reference to Callosobruchus maculatus and integrated molecular inventions to decrease bruchids populations and enhance pulse productivity in pulses.

show abstract

A second VrPGIP1 allele is associated with bruchid resistance (Callosobruchus spp.) in wild mungbean (Vigna radiata var. sublobata) accession ACC41

Cited by 19 publications

References 41 publications

Disparate genetic variants associated with distinct components of cowpea resistance to the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus

Disparate genetic variants associated with distinct components of cowpea resistance to the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus

Direct evidence for a new mode of plant defense against insects via a novel polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein expression strategy

Management of stored grain pest with special reference to Callosobruchus maculatus, a major pest of cowpea: A review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About