A Security Theater of Dreams: Supporters’ Responses to “Safety” and “Security” Following the Old Trafford “Fake Bomb” Evacuation

Abstract

On May 15, 2016, reports emerged of a “suspect package” inside Old Trafford minutes before kick-off in Manchester United’s game versus Bournemouth. The “suspect package,” causing a full-scale evacuation, and match postponement, turned out to be a “fake bomb” accidently left following a security exercise. Minimal social research investigates responses from supporters to “security” and “safety” at large sports events. Although the “suspect package,” fortunately, never “materialized,” it represents an important case in English football. Theoretically, this study adopts a frame analysis technique pioneered by Erving Goffman and it empirically examines supporters’ responses to security during the chaotic hours of the “fake bomb” incident, as articulated on an interactive message board. Overall, supporters were satisfied with police and security management’s handling of the incident, although it was questioned how the “fake bomb” was not detected. Importantly, supporters agreed that “safety comes first.”

How Could Increasing Temperature Scenarios Alter the Risk of Terrorist Acts in Different Historical Squares? A Simulation-Based Approach in Typological Italian Squares

“…Human behaviours during terrorist acts have been defined to be implemented in emergency simulators [33,34]. The main approaches used to derive behavioural tasks concern interviews with survivors of real-world attacks [78,79], empirical studies on realworld events [23,35] and, more recently, virtual reality-based studies [80]. In detail, recent efforts were aimed at assessing the most probable behaviours according to the analysis of real-world events by aggregating all the collected data and dividing them by specific contexts, i.e., in terms of the type of attack and built environment in which the event occurred (indoor versus outdoor) [23].…”

Examining Stakeholder Outlooks on Football Policing and Security: The Case of Euro 2020

“…As suggested, the relationships between football fans and police or other security actors, like stewards, are contested and complex (Cleland & Cashmore, 2018; Numerato, 2018). Whereas fans appreciate when their safety is prioritised, and expect a security presence (Lee Ludvigsen & Millward, 2020), it is important, as Numerato (2018, p. 74) writes, that “[f]ootball fans express their discontent with a variety of security measures, including fan cards, fan databases, surveillance systems, policing, stewarding or physical separation.” The criminalization of fans and “policing” represent contested terrains in football, both “on-the-ground” and on policy and legislation levels. Still, football supporters—composing a large social group—are often viewed as a threat to public order across Europe (Tsoukala et al, 2016).…”