2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A selection of material using a novel type decision-making method: Preference selection index method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
171
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 345 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
171
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The author also used principle component analysis (PCA) to benchmark each other to get better decision in selection of the materials. Maniya and Bhatt [53] studied three difference types of materials selection problems and conclude that PSI is the most appropriate technique in materials selection. In addition, the relative importance between alternative materials selection attributes is finally defined the best solution and it is the beauty of PSI method.…”
Section: Preference Selection Index (Psi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The author also used principle component analysis (PCA) to benchmark each other to get better decision in selection of the materials. Maniya and Bhatt [53] studied three difference types of materials selection problems and conclude that PSI is the most appropriate technique in materials selection. In addition, the relative importance between alternative materials selection attributes is finally defined the best solution and it is the beauty of PSI method.…”
Section: Preference Selection Index (Psi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preference selection index method was developed by Maniya and Bhatt [10] for solving the multi-criteria decision-making problems. In this approach, it is not necessary to assign a relative importance between attributes.…”
Section: Methodology 31 Preference Selection Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of transforming attributes value into a range of [0,1] is called normalization and it is required in MADM methods to transform performance rating with different data measurement unit in a decision matrix into a compatible unit [19][20][21]. The normalization method adopted from the paper [22], and the formulas are given as follows: Step 5.…”
Section: Group Eigenvalue Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%