2003
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45036-x_66
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Selection Process of COTS Components Based on the Quality of Software in a Special Attention to Internet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, researchers have focused on models and methods for reusable off-the-shelf software selection (Grau et al, 2004;Kizzort, 2001;Kontio et al, 1996;Kunda, 2003;Leung and Leung, 2002;Oh et al, 2003). However, there exists other literature which describes:…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In recent years, researchers have focused on models and methods for reusable off-the-shelf software selection (Grau et al, 2004;Kizzort, 2001;Kontio et al, 1996;Kunda, 2003;Leung and Leung, 2002;Oh et al, 2003). However, there exists other literature which describes:…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Criteria to be considered for software evaluation are usually classified in several groups. Quality characteristics of the software package such as functionality, reliability, usability, efficiency, maintainability, and portability have been used as evaluation criteria group in several studies [15,16,27,43,48,49,56,63,72]. Among the ISO/IEC standards related to software quality, ISO/IEC 9126-1 specifically addresses quality model definition and its use as framework for software evaluation.…”
Section: Evaluation Criteria (Rq5)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, researchers have focused on models and methods for reusable off-the-shelf software selection [5,13,17,29,31,32,34,36,48,59]. However, there exists other literature that:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The criteria are categorized into several groups such as functionality, reliability, usability, efficiency, maintainability, and portability. These criteria have been featured in several studies (Franch and Carvallo 2002 , 2003 ; Morisio and Tsoukias 1997 ; Oh et al 2003 ; Ossadnik and Lange 1999 ; Rincon et al 2005 ; Welzel and Hausen 1993 ; Stamelos et al 2000 ; Jadhav and Sonar 2009a , b ). Among the ISO/IEC standards related to software quality, ISO/IEC 9126-1 specifically provides a quality model definition, which is used as a framework for software evaluation (Jadhav and Sonar 2009a , b ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%