“…Decision trees and other supervised machine learning approaches (e.g., random forest) attempt to model the relationship between a response and its predictors (Breiman 2001), offer powerful alternatives to traditional ecological modeling approaches (e.g., generalized linear models; De'ath and Fabricius 2000, Olden et al 2008), and have been increasingly applied in investigations of wildlife habitat use (Han et al 2017, Mi et al 2017, Cushman and Wasserman 2018, Carroll et al 2021, Rather et al 2021). We built decision trees by incorporating plot‐level data into a boosted C5.0 algorithm (Quinlan 1993), which we chose because of its nominal sensitivity to multicollinearity and unbalanced data, ability to manage missing values, and relative ease of interpretation (Guilherme et al 2018, Szilassi et al 2019, Moeinaddini et al 2020, Tanyu et al 2021, da Silveira et al 2022). Allowing for missing values was particularly important in selecting our modeling approach, as calculation of some values in our dataset was contingent on another value being non‐zero (e.g., we could not calculate average log diameter in plots that did not contain any logs).…”