1963
DOI: 10.13182/nse63-a17391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Semiempirical Formula for Differential Dose Albedo for Gamma Rays on Concrete

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1964
1964
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, in a closed room, reflection by walls, roof and floor can significantly contribute to the dose rate, and has to be estimated using another method or code like Chilton-Huddleston albedo method [6] or Monte-Carlo code TRIPOLI-4®.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Physical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in a closed room, reflection by walls, roof and floor can significantly contribute to the dose rate, and has to be estimated using another method or code like Chilton-Huddleston albedo method [6] or Monte-Carlo code TRIPOLI-4®.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Physical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chapman 24 extended the LeDoux-Chilton approach to include double reflections and second-order effects such as a wall backscatter followed by a corner-lip inscatter. In place of the total albedos with the assumption of isotropy of the reflected radiation used by LeDoux and Chilton, Chapman substituted the semiempirical formula for the differential dose albedo that was derived by Chilton and Huddleston 25 (see Section 5.1.5). The two parameters in this formula were determined by a least-squares fit to the Monte Carlo data of Raso.…”
Section: Ornl-dwg 66-10410mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Song derived a semiempirical formula for use in the calculations in terms of a singleenergy parameter for the differential neutron dose albedo in a manner analogous to that used by Chilton and Huddleston 25 in their gamma-ray calculations. Values for the energy-dependent parameter were obtained by a least-squares analysis that gave the best fit to the data of Allen et al Monte Carlo Methods for Rectangular Ducts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 ConseQuently, initial radiations are significant only for small weapons or for high blast ~evels around large weapons. Since there appears to be little incentive for a prospective enemy to use small weapons either against the general public {because large area coverage would be reQuired) or against hardened military installations (because high blast levels would be neededh a primary area of concern, insofar as ini tia.l radiation dose protection is concerned, is for large weapons and heavily shielded structures, such as missile bases or military command posts.…”
Section: Disclaimermentioning
confidence: 99%