2019
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Sensitivity Analysis Comparison of Three Models for the Dynamics of Germinal Centers

Abstract: Germinal centers (GCs) are transient anatomical microenvironments where antibody affinity maturation and memory B cells generation takes place. In the past, models of Germinal Center (GC) dynamics have focused on understanding antibody affinity maturation rather than on the main mechanism(s) driving their rise-and-fall dynamics. Here, based on a population dynamics model core, we compare three mechanisms potentially responsible for this GC biphasic behavior dependent on follicular dendritic cell (FDC) maturati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The purpose was not to identify which parameters have the greatest impact on the models' quantitative output, for which we could have resorted to Latin hypercube sampling and quantitative sensitivity analysis as done by others (e.g. [25,26]). Our more immediate goal was to relax the parameter settings in order to detect potential mixed scenarios.…”
Section: The Decaying Envelope and Temporal Organisation Of The Ca-spmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The purpose was not to identify which parameters have the greatest impact on the models' quantitative output, for which we could have resorted to Latin hypercube sampling and quantitative sensitivity analysis as done by others (e.g. [25,26]). Our more immediate goal was to relax the parameter settings in order to detect potential mixed scenarios.…”
Section: The Decaying Envelope and Temporal Organisation Of The Ca-spmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our more immediate goal was to relax the parameter settings in order to detect potential mixed scenarios. Because our assessment of the model output is essentially a qualitative (binary) criterium of coherence with observations, the quantitative sensitivity analysis via partial rank correlation coefficients (as in [25]) or other methods (as in [26]) was not feasible. Based on these considerations, we devised a simple algorithm inspired on adaptive evolutionary dynamics to explore the parameter space.…”
Section: The Decaying Envelope and Temporal Organisation Of The Ca-spmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the system’s response to the force will be determined by the sensitivity of the parameters with respect to the applied force. The sensitivity , of the variable X with respect to f [ 57 , 58 ] is defined as: …”
Section: Is There a Role For Catch-bonds In Bcr–ligand Interactions?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the system's response to the force will be determined by the sensitivity of the parameters with respect to the applied force. The sensitivity σ X ( f ), of the variable X with respect to f [57,58] is defined as:…”
Section: Conditions For the Existence Of Catch-slip Bonds In Bcr-ag Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%