2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-40846-5_58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Sensitivity Analysis for Quality Measures of Quantitative Association Rules

Abstract: Abstract. There exist several fitness function proposals based on a combination of weighted objectives to optimize the discovery of association rules. Nevertheless, some differences in the measures used to assess the quality of association rules could be obtained according to the values of such weights. Therefore, in such proposals it is very important the user's decision in order to specify the weights or coefficients of the optimized objectives. Thus, this work presents an analysis on the sensitivity of seve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the measures considered in this work as well as their mathematical formulation are summarized in Table 1, where n(X) is the number of occurrences of the itemset X in the dataset and N is the total number of instances in the dataset. ND A preliminary study about how the weights, in a fitness function based on a sum of weighted measures, have an influence on the quality measures was provided in [20]. However, this study was reduced as it was applied only for the weights associated to the support and confidence measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the measures considered in this work as well as their mathematical formulation are summarized in Table 1, where n(X) is the number of occurrences of the itemset X in the dataset and N is the total number of instances in the dataset. ND A preliminary study about how the weights, in a fitness function based on a sum of weighted measures, have an influence on the quality measures was provided in [20]. However, this study was reduced as it was applied only for the weights associated to the support and confidence measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%