A service-system paradigm for governing corporate sustainability: the (forgotten) role of governing body in shaping sustainability and context

Abstract

Corporate sustainability (CS), as an evolutionary concept, covers better many open questions and scientific confusion of corporate social responsibility (CSR). While CSR has not well defined the concept of environment, CS has recovered this gap ignoring at the same time the fundamental passage from environment to context and the context's architect/ designer (i.e., the governing body, GB). Therefore, this study, after reviewing the barriers of a corporate-context sustainability, shows how the GB, influenced by the components of information variety (i.e., information units, interpretation schemes and categorical values), contextualises the sustainability. A service-system conceptual model, based on viable systems approach (VSA) and service-dominant logic, constructs the foundations for consonance and value cocreation between the GB, context's suprasystems, general environment (e.g., other stakeholders) and international standards (e.g., GRI, Global Compact, etc.). The model integrates also the GRI-G4 report with subjective elements of the GB. 4X. Hysa et al.

Open Total Quality Management in the Circular Economy age: a social enterprise perspective through the case of Patagonia

“…governance) has been replaced by international standards, ignoring the subjective traits of the Governing Body and the uniqueness of the Context (i.e. value-in-use), which in turn are core elements to ensure the 'E' (environmental sustainability) and the 'S' (social sustainability or stakeholder engagement) (Hysa et al, 2016). For these reasons, we launch a TQM expanded version through the lens of the VSA, where the governing body, the context and the suprasystems (i.e.…”

Regional Branding of Western Balkans Through Sustainable Tourism

“…Destination sustainability is a precursor to sound destination development and marketing efforts. Since sustainability is contextspecific (Hysa et al, 2016), analysing sustainability from a 'destination perspective' becomes almost physiological. Traveling is an important component that would contribute to the development of sustainable destinations.…”

Preventing and developmental factors of sustainability in healthcare organisations from the perspective of decision makers: an exploratory factor analysis

“…Although the competitive advantage that integration of sustainable principles in core policies and overall performance goals can bring, [ 19 ] states that there is no “one size fits all” sustainable approach and the challenge for organisations about sustainability lies in determining what their organisational strategy should be. The lack of a specific strategy could be searched in the habits of the organisations to calculate everything in financial terms and in the difficulty of aligning the other non-financial aspects, indispensable for sustainability [ 20 ], or in the absence of a “subjective interpretation” of the governing body during the planning of organisational sustainability in the specific context [ 21 ], as well as in the absence of a shared strategy and interpretative keys on how the development objectives have to be pursued [ 22 ].…”