Tuco-Tucos 2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-61679-3_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Short Overview of the Systematics of Ctenomys: Species Limits and Phylogenetic Relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sampling locations of Reserva Provincial Parque Luro, Anguil, Macachín, and Villa Maza grouped within the mendocinus clade in the phylogeny carried out with the cyt-b locus (these were sequenced only for this molecular marker: see Table 1 ) with a maximum posterior probability and greater affinity with C. azarae and C. porteousi . These results are partially in disagreement with those reported by D’Elía et al (2021) , who proposed that C. azarae and C. porteousi should be considered as subjective junior synonyms of C. mendocinus .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sampling locations of Reserva Provincial Parque Luro, Anguil, Macachín, and Villa Maza grouped within the mendocinus clade in the phylogeny carried out with the cyt-b locus (these were sequenced only for this molecular marker: see Table 1 ) with a maximum posterior probability and greater affinity with C. azarae and C. porteousi . These results are partially in disagreement with those reported by D’Elía et al (2021) , who proposed that C. azarae and C. porteousi should be considered as subjective junior synonyms of C. mendocinus .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond this, these authors recognize the need for more in-depth comprehensive studies regarding aspects of morphological and molecular taxonomy. On the other hand, D’Elía et al (2021) did not mention some attributes of the natural phenotypic variation (e.g., body sizes; pelage colors) and the conformation of major phylogeographic groups highlighted in Mapelli et al (2017) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…in the Andean range (Bidau 2015;Freitas 2016). Currently, 66 species are recognized as formally described independent units (Bidau 2015;Freitas 2016;D'Elía et al 2021;Brook et al 2022;Mapelli et al 2022), and several other populations have been or are being recognized as separately evolving lineages, although they have not yet been formally nominated. As pointed out by D' Elía et al (2021), the systematics of Ctenomys remains in a state of flux due to both intrinsic aspects of its evolutionary process and the patchy history of its study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, species boundaries may often be difficult to define. In addition, remarkable morphological homogeneity is frequent even among long-standing differentiated species (D'Elía et al 2021). In such a still largely inconclusive scenario, however, major systematic and phylogenetic knowledge has been generated in just over two decades (e.g., Lessa and Cook 1998;D'Elía et al 1999;Mascheretti et al 2000;Slamovits et al 2001;Castillo et al 2005;Parada et al 2011;Gardner et al 2014;Bidau 2015;Freitas 2016Freitas , 2021Caraballo and Rossi 2018;Fornel et al 2018;Leipnitz et al 2020;Teta and D'Elía 2020;D'Elía et al 2021;De Santi et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%