2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.09.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Significant Role for Anti–Human Leukocyte Antigen Antibodies and Antibody-Mediated Rejection in the Biopsy-for-Cause Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7,18 Brain-dead donors also differ from living donors (LDs) in terms of DAMP generation, e.g., by more intensive release of HMGB1 by renal tubular cells 6,25 and of IL1β, TNF-α, IL12, and IL6 by local monocytes/macrophages and mature dendritic cells (mDCs) located inside the kidney. 7,15 Several factors may contribute to damage of endothelia, e.g., anti-human leukocyte antibodies (HLA), 34 non-HLA antibodies 4,35 or shear stress causing shedding of glycocalyces with a subsequent increase in permeability. 8,31 Cellular stress induces an increase in complement activation with C3a (and C5a) generation 15 by resident cells and infiltrating leukocytes.…”
Section: Innate Immunity: From Brain Death To Reperfusion Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7,18 Brain-dead donors also differ from living donors (LDs) in terms of DAMP generation, e.g., by more intensive release of HMGB1 by renal tubular cells 6,25 and of IL1β, TNF-α, IL12, and IL6 by local monocytes/macrophages and mature dendritic cells (mDCs) located inside the kidney. 7,15 Several factors may contribute to damage of endothelia, e.g., anti-human leukocyte antibodies (HLA), 34 non-HLA antibodies 4,35 or shear stress causing shedding of glycocalyces with a subsequent increase in permeability. 8,31 Cellular stress induces an increase in complement activation with C3a (and C5a) generation 15 by resident cells and infiltrating leukocytes.…”
Section: Innate Immunity: From Brain Death To Reperfusion Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 The precise cause of CAI remains unclear, but appears to be related to pathological changes due to organ preservation, IRI prior to and after organ implantation, 17 drug-related nephrotoxicity (e.g., calcineurin inhibitors), and chronic immune injury 25 with, e.g., anti-endothelial cell antibodies, anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor (anti-AT1R) antibodies, anti-endothelin receptor antibodies (anti-ETAR), 4 non-HLA antibodies, 4,35 or anti-HLA antibodies (in our observation, about 50% patients with anti-HLA antibodies return to dialysis). 35 A transplanted kidney undergoing CAI releases DAMPs of varying intensity. Several molecules are implicated in this process, including fragments of nucleic acids, extracellular matrices (hyaluronic acid, fibronectin, heparin sulfate), HMGB1, fibrinogen, uric acid crystals, heat shock proteins, and fibrin.…”
Section: Chronic Graft Injuriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Late AMR has been recognized as a clinically distinct entity from early AMR that is resistant to treatment and associated with poor allograft survival [1822]. Previous authors have noted stabilization or improvement of late AMR with bortezomib [21, 26, 28, 29], but our case series is the first to report this finding in a cohort of mainly high risk adolescents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In vitro studies have shown that bortezomib treated lymphocytes [47] and multiple myeloma cells [48] preferentially reduce HLA Class I expression and decrease stimulation for continued Class I antibody production [47]. The effect of bortezomib on cell surface expression of HLA Class I but not Class II may explain why this therapy has not produced dramatic recovery of renal function or biopsy findings in many patients with late AMR associated with HLA Class II DSAs [22, 49]. Interestingly, patients treated with bortezomib have shown modest improvement in eGFR despite the persistence of DSAs, which is consistent with our findings [25, 26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation