2007
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple and reproducible scoring system for EGFR in colorectal cancer: application to prognosis and prediction of response to preoperative brachytherapy

Abstract: The aim of this study was to determine the predictive and prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression in rectal cancers treated with preoperative high-dose rate brachytherapy and in mismatch-repair (MMR)-proficient colorectal cancers (CRCs), respectively. We validate the use of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to select cutoff scores for EGFR overexpression for the end points studied. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for EGFR was performed on 82 rectal tumour biopsies… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
52
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(72 reference statements)
1
52
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of our previous findings, 11 of these markers were identified as significant and independent prognostic factors in MMR-proficient CRC and, thus, were selected for the current investigation. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] uPA and uPAR also were included in FIGURE 1. Receiver-operating characteristic curves for protein markers that had discriminatory power for survival in lymph node-negative mismatch repairproficient colorectal cancer, namely, urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) (A), uPA receptor (uPAR) (B), p27 (C), and CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (D).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the basis of our previous findings, 11 of these markers were identified as significant and independent prognostic factors in MMR-proficient CRC and, thus, were selected for the current investigation. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] uPA and uPAR also were included in FIGURE 1. Receiver-operating characteristic curves for protein markers that had discriminatory power for survival in lymph node-negative mismatch repairproficient colorectal cancer, namely, urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) (A), uPA receptor (uPAR) (B), p27 (C), and CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (D).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reproducibility of this scoring method between pathologists has been demonstrated previously for TMAs. 16,17,21 uPA and uPAR were evaluated by 2 independent pathologists, and the average of their scores was used in subsequent analyses. MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 were considered negative for the protein when 0% of the tumor cells were stained.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Ihcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proportion of immunoreactive tumour cells over the total number of tumour cells by 5% increments (0, 5, 10, and so on up to 100%) was determined by three pathologists (A Lugli, JR Jass, S Hayashi) for EGFR and by four pathologists (CC Compton, A Lugli, JR Jass, RP Michel) for p53, Bcl-2, VEGF and APAF-1. This scoring method was previously found to be highly reproducible between pathologists (Zlobec et al, 2006a(Zlobec et al, , 2007c. Only areas of invasive carcinoma were analysed.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Immunohistochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reproducibility of this scoring method between pathologists has previously been demonstrated for TMAs. 31 …”
Section: Evaluation Of Immunohistochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%