1978
DOI: 10.1016/0003-2697(78)90434-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple, rapid, and precise method for calculating the steroid hormone-receptor complex concentration in the presence of saturating levels of hormone by using “differential dissociation” techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1979
1979
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained indicate that up to high ribosome concentrations Kn varies linearly (Figure 4). This behavior seems to be general and has been described for some ligand-protein interactions (Truong & Bailieu, 1971; Richard-Foy et al, 1978). At the concentrations of 80S ribosomes and 40S ribosomal subunits (5 and 1.7 OD2eo units, respectively) used in the experiments for the determination of the values of both Kd and n of the specific component, the values of Kn were 0.48 and 0.17, respectively (Figure 4).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results obtained indicate that up to high ribosome concentrations Kn varies linearly (Figure 4). This behavior seems to be general and has been described for some ligand-protein interactions (Truong & Bailieu, 1971; Richard-Foy et al, 1978). At the concentrations of 80S ribosomes and 40S ribosomal subunits (5 and 1.7 OD2eo units, respectively) used in the experiments for the determination of the values of both Kd and n of the specific component, the values of Kn were 0.48 and 0.17, respectively (Figure 4).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…This type of phenomenon is well documented since binding of a number of radioactively labeled ligands (i.e., catecholamines, muscarinic acid, steroid hormones, etc.) to both their specific and nonspecific receptor sites is inhibited by chemically related antagonistic drugs (Cuatrecasas et al, 1974;Levitzki et al, 1975;Beld et al, 1980;Richard-Foy et al, 1978). Obviously under these experimental conditions any attempt to calculate the apparent dissociation constant of the interacting ligand (on the basis of the amount of cold antagonist that displaces 50% of the labeled ligand) could result in serious errors (Jacobs et al, 1975;Levitzki et al, 1975).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This technique can be used with diluted extracts without causing the loss of activity that occurs in the presence of charcoal when the protein concentration is lower than 1 mg/ml. In both cases the background was determined by either the isotopic dilution or the double concentration measurement method [12].…”
Section: Receptor-ligand Complex Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the [3H] -170-estradiolchromium tricarbonyl complex shows higher levels of nonspecific binding than [3H]E2, it is important to correct for this nonspecific binding in the concentration of the free ligand in binding affinity experiments. A method for making such corrections has been described (Katznellenbogen et al, 1978;Richard-Foy et al, 1978;. According to these authors, the free ligand concentration which is normally considered to be the difference between total added ligand and the receptor-bound ligand must be corrected by a 1 + nk factor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%