2020
DOI: 10.1002/mana.201900109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simpler description of the κ‐topologies on the spaces DLp,Lp,M1

Abstract: For the spaces DLp, Lp and M1, we consider the topology of uniform convergence on absolutely convex compact subsets of their (pre‐)dual space. Following the notation of J. Horváth's book we call these topologies κ‐topologies. They are given by a neighbourhood basis consisting of polars of absolutely convex and compact subsets of their (pre‐)dual spaces. In many cases it is more convenient to work with a description of the topology by means of a family of semi‐norms defined by multiplication and/or convolution … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [4, Proposition 6.4], a characterization of relatively compact subsets C of scriptM1$\mathcal {M}^1$ is given: (g,h)C0×L1:Cg(hB1,1)$\exists (g,h) \in \mathcal {C}_0 \times L^1: C \subset g(h * B_{1,1})$, B1,1={μscriptM1:‖‖μ11}$B_{1,1} = \lbrace \mu \in \mathcal {M}^1: \left\Vert \mu \right\Vert _1 \le 1 \rbrace$. This is not correct: A counterexample is C=false{δfalse}$C = \lbrace \delta \rbrace$.…”
Section: Projective Description Of Mackey Topologies and Buck's Topol...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [4, Proposition 6.4], a characterization of relatively compact subsets C of scriptM1$\mathcal {M}^1$ is given: (g,h)C0×L1:Cg(hB1,1)$\exists (g,h) \in \mathcal {C}_0 \times L^1: C \subset g(h * B_{1,1})$, B1,1={μscriptM1:‖‖μ11}$B_{1,1} = \lbrace \mu \in \mathcal {M}^1: \left\Vert \mu \right\Vert _1 \le 1 \rbrace$. This is not correct: A counterexample is C=false{δfalse}$C = \lbrace \delta \rbrace$.…”
Section: Projective Description Of Mackey Topologies and Buck's Topol...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 7, we correct an error in [4,Proposition 6.4]. We characterize weakly relatively compact subsets of M 1 and we prove a generalization of Buck's topology by a projective description of the spaces (B 𝑚 , 𝜏(B 𝑚 ,…”
Section: Introduction and Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Section 7 we correct an error in [4,Proposition 6.4]. We characterize weakly relatively compact subsets of M 1 and we prove a generalization of Buck's topology by a projective description of the spaces (B m , τ…”
Section: Introduction and Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The representation of function and distribution spaces by sequence spaces is a central topic in functional analysis that goes back to the pioneering work of Valdivia and Vogt [27,28] and is closely connected to the isomorphic classification of such spaces. In particular, there has been a considerable interest in the sequence space representations of the classical Schwartz spaces D L p , B, Ḃ and D ′ L p , B ′ , Ḃ′ [3,4,5,13,23,26,28]. The main goal of this article is to unify and generalize these known representations by providing sequence representations for test function and distribution spaces defined via a broad class of translation-modulation invariant Banach spaces that was recently introduced in [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%