2016 10th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/eucap.2016.7481318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A single feed dual-band circularly polarized millimeter-wave antenna for 5G communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [7], a tilted antenna was designed by combining a patch and a waveguide aperture, but which is not suitable for integration. Dual-band (28/38 GHz) antenna element with circular polarization was reported in [8]. However, the bandwidths are considerable narrow (less than 3%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [7], a tilted antenna was designed by combining a patch and a waveguide aperture, but which is not suitable for integration. Dual-band (28/38 GHz) antenna element with circular polarization was reported in [8]. However, the bandwidths are considerable narrow (less than 3%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A three layers of substrates have been used in [11] to design a Fabry-Perot cavity antenna operates at 36 GHz with high gain. In [12], Lshaped slots have been used to obtain a dual band 28 / 38 GHz slotted patch antenna.…”
Section: And 35mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiband antennas have massive applications in millimeter band applications. A various techniques in the literature have been developed for multiband microstrip antennas as in [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. For instance, a multilayer GaAs is described in [4] to achieve a multiband antenna operating at 35 GHz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single band and dual band mm‐wave antennas for 5G applications were studied in References 1 and 10‐19 . In some of them via‐free microstrip‐fed patch antennas were used, while in others SIW antennas were analyzed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%