A Single Journal Study: Malaysian Journal of Computer Science

Zainab, A.N.; Anyi, K. W. U.; Anuar, Nor Badrul

doi:10.22452/mjcs.vol22no1.1

Cited by 23 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 45 publications

(42 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The basic research capacity of a journal is connoted by the volume of issues it publishes in a year. [5,6] As per the data obtained from our study, rise in a number of issues (two additional supplements) was seen in JIOS from 2012 which further increased to four supplements in 2013. There could possibly be two reasons for the sudden increase in a number of issues.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 70%

Bibliometric Study of Three Journals of Orthodontics: A Comparative Analysis of 10 years

Chatterjee

Mohanty

Sahoo

et al. 2018

J Indian Orthod Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this study was to conduct a comparative analysis of profiles of three esteemed journals of orthodontics: The American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (AJODO), the Angle orthodontist (AO), and collate it with the Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society (JIOS) from 2008 to 2017. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted, where all the issues of JIOS, AO, and AJODO were hand searched from 2008 to 2017 for specifications such as study design, authorship pattern, and area of interest of research. The data were analyzed and recognized with the help of SPSS Version 21.0. Descriptive statistics were performed, and the selected parameters were analyzed with Pearson Chi-square test at 0.5 level significance. Results: A total of 1846 articles from AJODO, 1440 from AO, and 515 articles from JIOS were retrieved. Majority of articles published in AO (93%), AJODO (68.5%), and JIOS (55.3%) were original research. Almost 25.5% of research in AJODO, 25.3% in AO, and 34% in JIOS were related to appliance design and materials used, whereas 61% articles in AJODO, 64.6% in AO, and 52.2% articles in JIOS involved more than three authors. Nearly 92.5% contribution in AJODO, 93.3% in AO, and 96.6% in JIOS were from educational institutes. Conclusion: The publication pattern in all the journals was interestingly similar to each other; most articles published were original research work signifying an increased inclination of researchers toward experimental affirmations.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 70%

Bibliometric Study of Three Journals of Orthodontics: A Comparative Analysis of 10 years

Chatterjee

Mohanty

Sahoo

et al. 2018

J Indian Orthod Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The study found that 161 articles attracted a total of 87 citations, 52 of which were self-citations, with 14 per cent of the MJLIS articles having been cited at least once. Zainab et al (2009) divulged the authorship and co-authorship pattern in Malaysian Journal of Computer Science and the journal impact factor ( JIF). Park (2010) depicted author collaboration, authors' affiliations, and geographical distribution of authors of the first 13 years' publication patterns of D-Lib Magazine.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bibliometric analysis of Library Review from 2007 to 2011

Swain

Rautaray

2013

Library Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose -This paper aims to examine the scholarly communications in Library Review (LR) from 2007 to 2011 and to reveal key aspects of its publication trends. Design/methodology/approach -The study analyses five volumes of LR from the year 2007 to 2011 and employs the required bibliometric measures to analyze specific aspects of publishing trends of LR for the stated period. Findings -The study finds that single authored articles occupy the prominent position indicating the supremacy of solo research in LR. The degree of collaboration in the publications of this journal is found to be 0.36. It is evident that LR has accommodated over 22 citations per article during the publication phase from 2007 to 2011. In regard to country productivity, the UK leads the table, followed by the USA and Nigeria. However, Poland occupies the bottom position in the ranking. Hence, it is evident that the major chunks of contributions reflected in the publications of LR during the stated period are emanated from the UK and the USA.Research limitations/implications -The study focuses on the publication patterns of LR over a period of five years. Patterns of research output in 275 publications are analyzed. Further studies can include a comparative study of LR with that of a contemporary journal in the field of library and information science (LIS). Practical implications -Teachers and research scholars of LIS can benefit from insights into the scholarly contributions of LR that has accommodated 312 authors representing 49 countries. Originality/value -The study yields some interesting findings of academic publishing in LR. It can help the readers of LR to understand the most striking contributions, highly cited journals, the most prolific authors, country productivity, and assorted parameters.

show abstract

“…Wan et al (2009) conducted a comprehensive in-depth review of 82 single-journal bibliometric studies conducted between 1998 and 2008 covering a wide range of subject disciplines and geographic locations. The amount of single journal studies published Willett, 2008, 2009;Das, 2013;Dwivedi et al, 2008;Dwivedi and Mustafee, 2010;Dwivedi and Weerakkody, 2010;Dwivedi, 2009;Hashim, 2012;Minas et al, 2014;Mustafee et al, 2010;Rao et al, 2014;Sanni and Zainab, 2010;Swain, 2014aSwain, , 2014bSwain, 2013;Zainab et al, 2009) shows that it is a useful research approach to map the intellectual activity, growth and maturity in a subject discipline.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries (2000 – 2013): A Bibliometric Study

Naudé

2016

E J Info Sys Dev Countries

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A systematic analysis was performed of 378 articles published in the 59 volumes of the Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries (EJISDC) in the period 2000 to 2013. The aim of the study was to create a bibliometric profile of the journal by investigating variables such as the article productivity, Web citations and non-Web citations, authorship patterns, background of the authors, institutional collaboration, degree of collaboration, as well as most productive authors and institutions together with their countries and regional affiliations. This study used the bibliographic database Inspec as a data collection source. Results of the study reveal that the average number of articles per year was 27 and the average length of an article 16.24 pages. The reference list analysis showed that most authors cite print resources, with 81.89% non-Web references compared to 18.11% Web references. A total of 697 authors contributed to this journal, with an average of 2.16 authors per article. An overwhelming 86.51% of the authors are from a university background. The journal displays a collaborative authorship pattern with 250 (66.14%) articles that were co-authored, compared to 128 (33.86%) that were single authored.

show abstract

A Single Journal Study: Malaysian Journal of Computer Science

Abstract: Single journal studies are reviewed and measures used in the studies are highlighted. The following quantitative measures are used to study 272

Cited by 23 publications

References 45 publications

Bibliometric Study of Three Journals of Orthodontics: A Comparative Analysis of 10 years

Bibliometric Study of Three Journals of Orthodontics: A Comparative Analysis of 10 years

Bibliometric analysis of Library Review from 2007 to 2011

Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries (2000 – 2013): A Bibliometric Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About