A Social–Ecological Systems Framework as a Tool for Understanding the Effectiveness of Biosphere Reserve Management

Abstract

Biosphere reserves aim to reconciliate social and economic development with biodiversity conservation through complex spatial and governance arrangements. However, there is a generalized lack of information about how biosphere reserves are being managed and governed, and at what point their goals are being achieved, which limits a better understanding of the factors influencing biosphere reserve management effectiveness. Building on a systematic review of existing empirical studies, we developed a framework that identifies the main features related to biosphere reserve management effectiveness. We identified four main categories—context, inputs, process and outcomes—and 53 sub-categories, which interact at different scales and shape biosphere reserve effectiveness. We found that the capacity of biosphere reserves to achieve their goals is not only related to the way they are managed/governed, or to the inputs invested, but to many social and ecological contextual factors. We also identified benefits and impacts that were associated to biosphere reserves around the world. Comparing to other social–ecological system frameworks, ours provides a more inclusive approach, since it integrates the findings of studies with different research perspectives, considers a plurality of values attributed to natural resources, and the social–ecological system’s scales dynamics.

Asian Medicinal Plants’ Production and Utilization Potentials: A Review

“…The review is anchored on the sustainable development concept and by adopting [58] and [59], the literature screening approach was conducted to define the inclusion criteria (Table 1). Table 1.…”

Ecosystem service coproduction across the zones of biosphere reserves in Europe

“…Thus, a challenge in finding general patterns of ES coproduction across BRs is that there are no common guidelines on how much human modification or land use intensity is allowed in the different zones. While such standardisation might be desirable from a scientific point of view, a diversity of natural and cultural landscapes and land use practices is also part of the BR 'philosophy' (Ferreira et al 2018). Additionally, the overlap of different national and EU conservation areas (e.g.…”

Planning for Democracy in Protected Rural Areas: Application of a Voting Method in a Spanish-Portuguese Reserve

“…The concept of Biosphere Reserve protection, created by UNESCO's Man and Biosphere program (MAB) in the early 1970s, is a good example of integrated territorial planning. This model brings together efforts to preserve the natural environment, the complexity of the rural environment and the need to integrate economic and social development with the conservation of species and ecosystems [41]. In cases where such protected spaces are shared by several countries, it is necessary to adopt this new style of participatory governance in order to ensure the participation of all stakeholders at different levels and from different countries and regions [42].…”