A socio-spatial index for risk management in shrimp aquaculture across landscapes

Lien, Ho Hong; Mey, Yann de; Bush, Simon R.; Meuwissen, M.P.M.

doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735861

Cited by 8 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These include privatisation processes and certification schemes, 18,125,126,196 value, supply chains and trade, 23,34,35,124 gender roles and perspectives 116‐118,197,198 and livelihoods and employment 199 . Lastly, shared risk and beyond farm governance links closely to commons, with an emerging literature 24,25,27 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The sector also raises explicit land–sea connectivity issues and cross‐sectoral interconnectivities due to shared risk 24,25 . Compared to capture fisheries and agriculture, aquaculture is less likely to have property rights, established state policies, legislation, farmer cooperatives, supply chains or co‐management arrangements, although the sector competes for the use of many of the same resources 26,27 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Governing aquaculture commons

Partelow

Schlüter

Manlosa

et al. 2021

Reviews in Aquaculture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Knowledge of the shared resources—or commons—that aquaculture systems rely on, and the appropriate rule and norm systems to govern them—or institutions—is far behind other natural resource use sectors. In this article, we provide a conceptual framework for identifying the social and environmental commons creating collective action problems for aquaculture governance. Collective action problems, or social dilemmas, create problems for governing shared resources because the typical strategies for individual use (maximisation; free riding) are often divergent from broader group interests (e.g. fair contributions; sustainable use). This framework helps identify two types of collective action problems in aquaculture: first‐order (direct use and provision of commons) and second‐order (provision, maintenance and adaptation of institutions to govern commons). First‐order aquaculture commons with governance challenges include water quality, water quantity, physical space, inputs, genetic diversity, mitigating infectious disease, earth and climate stability, infrastructure, knowledge and money. Second‐order institutions govern the use of first‐order commons. These include rule and norm systems that structure property rights and markets, aiming to better align individual behaviour and collective interests (e.g. sustainability goals) through governance. However, which combination of institutions will fit best is likely to be unique to context, where aquaculture has important differences from capture fisheries and agriculture. We provide four case examples applying our conceptual framework to identify existing aquaculture commons, institutions and governance challenges in Peru (mariculture), the Philippines (earthen ponds), Nepal (raceways) and Denmark (recirculation).

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Governing aquaculture commons

Partelow

Schlüter

Manlosa

et al. 2021

Reviews in Aquaculture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…To ensure t he effective fu nctioning o f agricultu ral enterp rises in t he context o f the deve lopment of a mode rn economic syste m, it is i mportant to c arry out a syste matic analys is of the r isks of the ir functio ning, includ ing studyi ng and assess ing the poss ible results o f the impact o f risks on t he organiz ation and m anagement o f productio n in the ag ricultural secto r [1][2][3][4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Organizational and Managerial Mechanism for Risk Management of Agricultural Enterprises

Barmuta

Tuguz

2021

E3S Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article highlights issues related to the study of the approach to assessing and analyzing the risks of agricultural enterprises. An approach to conducting a full-fledged comprehensive analysis of risks and factors influencing them with the help of indicators for assessing financial performance is described. An algorithm for assessing risks based on calculating the dependence of the size of assets, the margin of financial strength and the leverage of production leverage and its effect is considered. The methodology and results of research on the practical study of farms in the Krasnodar Territory in terms of the level of financial strength in grain products and cattle meat are presented. Conclusions are made about the degree of risk exposure of these types of industries, the features of the results of diversification in agriculture are revealed.

show abstract

“…Many approaches to determining the efficiency of personnel management can be found in the economic literature, however, the generally accepted methodology was not developed in domestic or world practice [3,4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Grading as a progressive technology for managing financial incentives of employees

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

One of the most efficient ways to financially motivate personnel is grading, which is conducted using a number of stages of grading system development and implementation. The grading mechanism is considered, the job evaluation is carried out according to the selected factors using the example of the specific company. The summary analysis of the research results is provided in the article. According to the conclusions, the use of grading contributes to the efficiency increase of staff motivation, which ultimately leads to the increased labor productivity.

show abstract

A socio-spatial index for risk management in shrimp aquaculture across landscapes

Cited by 8 publications

References 43 publications

Governing aquaculture commons

Governing aquaculture commons

Organizational and Managerial Mechanism for Risk Management of Agricultural Enterprises

Grading as a progressive technology for managing financial incentives of employees

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About