2015
DOI: 10.1162/neco_a_00788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Sparse Reformulation of the Green’s Function Formalism Allows Efficient Simulations of Morphological Neuron Models

Abstract: We prove that when a class of partial differential equations, generalized from the cable equation, is defined on tree graphs and the inputs are restricted to a spatially discrete, well chosen set of points, the Green's function (GF) formalism can be rewritten to scale as O(n) with the number n of inputs locations, contrary to the previously reported O(n(2)) scaling. We show that the linear scaling can be combined with an expansion of the remaining kernels as sums of exponentials to allow efficient simulations … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not achievable with a classical point neuron model, although we do not exclude the possibility of a formulation of a point neuron that generates an effective electrotonic distance. Whereas recent works such as Memmesheimer and Timme ( 2012 ) and Wybo et al ( 2015 ) demonstrate that point neuron models can successfully model the somatic effect of non-linear integration of dendritic inputs, our work shows that at the network level, the electrotronic distance in a compartmental model can result in very different network dynamics.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…This is not achievable with a classical point neuron model, although we do not exclude the possibility of a formulation of a point neuron that generates an effective electrotonic distance. Whereas recent works such as Memmesheimer and Timme ( 2012 ) and Wybo et al ( 2015 ) demonstrate that point neuron models can successfully model the somatic effect of non-linear integration of dendritic inputs, our work shows that at the network level, the electrotronic distance in a compartmental model can result in very different network dynamics.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…Furthermore, due to dendritic filtering, the somatic postsynaptic potentials in the multicompartment model neurons are not identical to those of their point-neuron counterparts. This inconsistency could, at least partially, be resolved by adjusting the amplitudes and temporal shapes of the synaptic currents in either the multicompartment neurons or the point neurons ( Koch and Poggio 1985 ; Wybo et al 2013 ; 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synapses should be positioned on the dendritic tree according to anatomical data, and synaptic weights and time constants should be adapted such that the somatic membrane potential or somatic current match the point-neuron counterparts. Such mapping between point neurons and passive multicompartment neurons is feasible ( Koch and Poggio 1985 ; Wybo et al 2013 ; 2015 ).…”
Section: Methods and Materials: Hybrid Lfp Modeling Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today this difficulty has been obviated to a great extent thanks to online databases such as NeuroMorpho (Ascoli et al 2007;Halavi et al 2008) which freely provide simulator-ready neuronal morphologies. That said, morphological reduction is still investigated as a tool for enhancing computational efficacy (Destexhe 2001;Wybo et al 2015). It is important to note that morphology is not a constant thing but rather highly variable even between neurons of the same type (Cuntz et al 2007(Cuntz et al , 2010(Cuntz et al , 2011Hay et al 2011; Torben-Nielsen and De Schutter 2014).…”
Section: Methods In Compartmental Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biophysics of dendrites too can nonlinearly modulate integration of synaptic potentials on one hand (Cash and Yuste 1998Yuste , 1999Yuste 2011) and on another support local electrogenesis of dendritic spikes, leading to a nonlinear integration of synaptic potentials (Gasparini et al 2004;Gulledge et al 2005;Hausser et al 2000;Losonczy and Magee 2006;Makara and Magee 2013;Mel 1993;Nettleton and Spain 2000;Polsky et al 2004) and allowing the neuron to respond over a longer timescale. The nonlinear integration of synaptic inputs occurs either in response to functional or anatomical synapse clusters (Druckmann et al 2014;Losonczy and Magee 2006;Makino and Malinow 2011;McBride et al 2008;Poirazi et al 2003b;Polsky et al 2004;Yadav et al 2012). In the case of functional clustering, synchronous stimulation of nearby synapses within the same branch results in a supralinear summation, while stimulation of the same number of synapses located between branches sum in a linear way Cash and Yuste 1998;Hausser and Mel 2003;Larkum et al 2009;Losonczy and Magee 2006;Mel 1993;Oviedo and Reyes 2012;Poirazi et al 2003a;Polsky et al 2004), suggesting that a single dendritic branch acts as a computational compartment of the neuron.…”
Section: Complex Single-neuron Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%