1985
DOI: 10.1016/0167-8655(85)90053-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A spatial filtering approach to texture analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
71
0
4

Year Published

1989
1989
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
71
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In these cases it outperforms the two best conventional feature sets. It can also be seen that the performance of all feature sets, excepting RING & WEDGE [11], are enhanced when multi-resolution data are used. In addition, the Varma and Zisserman texton [54] versions of the shape context [4] and chain code histogram [32] termed VZ-SC and VZ-CCH here; perform better than the two local texton feature sets (SCTH and CCHTH).…”
Section: Experimental Results 1) Pair-of-pairs Based Evaluation Exmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In these cases it outperforms the two best conventional feature sets. It can also be seen that the performance of all feature sets, excepting RING & WEDGE [11], are enhanced when multi-resolution data are used. In addition, the Varma and Zisserman texton [54] versions of the shape context [4] and chain code histogram [32] termed VZ-SC and VZ-CCH here; perform better than the two local texton feature sets (SCTH and CCHTH).…”
Section: Experimental Results 1) Pair-of-pairs Based Evaluation Exmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The two best performing feature sets at these two resolutions, as reported in [17], i.e. Ring and Wedge Filters (RING & WEDGE) [11] and Multi-resolution Simultaneous Autoregressive Model (MRSAR) [37], were used as baselines for our comparison. These results are therefore shown separately in Fig.…”
Section: Experimental Results 1) Pair-of-pairs Based Evaluation Exmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations