2018
DOI: 10.1214/17-aoas1113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A spatially varying stochastic differential equation model for animal movement

Abstract: Animal movement exhibits complex behavior which can be influenced by unobserved environmental conditions. We propose a model which allows for a spatially-varying movement rate and spatially-varying drift through a semiparametric potential surface and a separate motility surface. These surfaces are embedded in a stochastic differential equation framework which allows for complex animal movement patterns in space. The resulting model is used to analyze the spatially-varying behavior of ants to provide insight in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we used the Euler discretization scheme to obtain pseudo maximum likelihood estimators. This scheme is the most widely used method to carry out inference for discretely observed diffusion processes, when the transition density is not analytically tractable (see Brillinger, 2010;Preisler et al, 2004;Russell, Hanks, Haran, & Hughes, 2018, for applications in ecology). There exist other pseudo-likelihood approaches, and Gloaguen et al (2018) argued that better inferences could be obtained with more refined schemes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we used the Euler discretization scheme to obtain pseudo maximum likelihood estimators. This scheme is the most widely used method to carry out inference for discretely observed diffusion processes, when the transition density is not analytically tractable (see Brillinger, 2010;Preisler et al, 2004;Russell, Hanks, Haran, & Hughes, 2018, for applications in ecology). There exist other pseudo-likelihood approaches, and Gloaguen et al (2018) argued that better inferences could be obtained with more refined schemes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animal movement models have also been developed to account for more mechanistic interactions among individuals (e.g., Russell et al, 2016;Scharf et al, 2015), and while we did not address those specifically, the approach we presented may also be beneficial in those settings. Furthermore, Bayesian animal movement models have been fit using integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA; Rue et al, 2009;Illian et al, 2012;Illian et al, 2013;Ruiz-Cárdenas et al, 2012;Jonsen, 2016), and one could use INLA to fit the hierarchical point process model in our first example.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The form of φ in (3.7) defines the expected drift as descending (or ascending if α < 0) along the gradient of the SST field, with a velocity that depends both on the temperature at the present location and a scalar α. This is somewhat similar to the varying motility surface used by Russell et al (2018) in an stochastic differential equation (SDE) model to allow the magnitude of the velocity vector to depend on the location. More specifically, we can view the latent field S as a scaled potential surface in which the gradient of S directs the expected movement with a velocity that also depends on the value of S at that location.…”
Section: A Preferential Movement Modelmentioning
confidence: 91%