“…A thorough evaluation of the AKDE compared against commonly used approaches, such as the MCP, KDE, and Local Convex Hull (LocoH), shows that the AKDE is superior in capturing space use out of sample and is the only estimator capable of producing unbiased estimates with low effective sample sizes . While AKDE is increasingly adopted in studies of animal ranging behavior (Crabb et al, 2022;Desbiez et al, 2020;Lenske & Nocera, 2018;McEvoy et al, 2019;Montano et al, 2021;Naveda-Rodríguez et al, 2022;Poessel et al, 2022), the overwhelming majority of studies still use methods, such as the MCP and KDE (Börger et al, 2020;Fleming & Calabrese, 2017;Hemson et al, 2005;Laver & Kelly, 2010;Powell, 2000). The potential presence of significant, systematic biases from applying these methods to estimate home-range area is concerning, because it can lead to erroneous conservation decision-making (Gaston et al, 2008) or inaccurate meta-analyses that influence public opinion and theoretical frameworks (Noonan et al, 2020).…”