A stakeholder approach to MCDA

Banville, Claude; Landry, Maurice; Martel, Jean‐Marc; Boulaire, Christèle

doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1743(199801/02)15:1<15::aid-sres179>3.3.co;2-2

Cited by 37 publications

(44 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Two recent proposals have been participatory multi-criteria evaluation (Banville et al, 1998) and social-multi-criteria evaluation (Munda, 2004). Two recent proposals have been participatory multi-criteria evaluation (Banville et al, 1998) and social-multi-criteria evaluation (Munda, 2004).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation for a Sustainable Economy

Munda¹

2008

306

232

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Banville et al (1998) offers a very well structured and convincing argumentation on the need to extend MCDA by incorporating the notion of the stakeholder. This necessity has been winning ever more recognition in a multi-criteria decision-aid (MCDA) framework.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation for a Sustainable Economy

Munda¹

2008

306

232

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Finally, a more recent development was to increase the level of public participation in the decision‐making process by way of a more participative and transparent evaluation process. This was done in order to take into account the policy/political constraints and responsibility (see Banville et al, 1998, for the developed of Stakeholder MCDA, and Munda, 2004 for the social multi‐criteria evaluation).…”

Section: Multi‐criteria Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Recent developments in multi-criteria evaluation of regulations

Bartolini

Viaggi

2010

Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops &Amp; Foods

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction Agricultural activity is affected by a wide set of regulations and prescriptions due to agricultural and non‐agricultural policies. In agricultural policy literature, growing attention is being paid to the issue of policy evaluation. Objectives The objective of this paper is to provide a literature review of the Multi‐Criteria Analysis applied in the evaluation of policy and regulations. Methodology The paper proceeds by firstly identifying the main issues of the policy evaluation process and then discussing the potential contribution of Multi‐Criteria Analysis as a decision support tool in a policy‐making context. Results Multi‐Criteria Analysis was created as a decision support tool for the selection of alternative projects when decisions are effected by trade‐offs between different criteria. However, existing applications to policy evaluations still show significant room for improvement. In particular, an improved ability to support decision‐making processes can be expected if Multi‐Criteria Analysis is included in a consistent process of monitoring and gathering of data, and both Multi‐Criteria Analysis and monitoring are developed in such a way as to provide a structured interaction with the decision maker in a participative approach. Conclusion A cautious integration of Multi‐Criteria comparison techniques and policy‐analysis concepts should be sought in order to better contribute to policy evaluation processes. Bartolini F & Viaggi D (2010). Recent developments in multi‐criteria evaluation of regulations. Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops & Foods, 2, 182–196

show abstract

“…It can be an adequate tool for dealing with a multiplicity of dimensions, ways of framing the problem, and uncertainties, in order to engage stakeholders to contribute to the alternative creation of rich narratives that are relevant for policy. ( 35–38 )…”

Section: Background On Integrated Approaches For Assessing the Coamentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing the Multidimensionality of Coastal Erosion Risks: Public Participation and Multicriteria Analysis in a Mediterranean Coastal System

2008

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The complex and multidimensional nature of coastal erosion risks makes it necessary to move away from single-perspective assessment and management methods that have conventionally predominated in coastal management. This article explores the suitability of participatory multicriteria analysis (MCA) for improving the integration of diverse expertises and values and enhancing the social-ecological robustness of the processes that lead to the definition of relevant policy options to deal with those risks. We test this approach in the Mediterranean coastal locality of Lido de Sète in France. Results show that the more adaptive alternatives such as "retreating the shoreline" were preferred by our selected stakeholders to those corresponding to "protecting the shoreline" and the business as usual proposals traditionally put forward by experts and policymakers on these matters. Participative MCA contributed to represent coastal multidimensionality, elicit and integrate different views and preferences, facilitated knowledge exchange, and allowed highlighting existing uncertainties.

show abstract

A stakeholder approach to MCDA

Cited by 37 publications

References 0 publications

Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation for a Sustainable Economy

Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation for a Sustainable Economy

Recent developments in multi-criteria evaluation of regulations

Assessing the Multidimensionality of Coastal Erosion Risks: Public Participation and Multicriteria Analysis in a Mediterranean Coastal System

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About