2012
DOI: 10.1186/1748-7161-7-s1-o42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A statistic approach to electronic moulding versus traditional plaster moulding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficiency in brace correction between the traditional plaster mould and the CAD/CAM moulding is not obvious. A better angular in-brace correction was noted with CAD/CAM, but it was not statistically significant [ 14 ]. For Wong the in-brace reduction with the manual method is 0.321 versus 0.419 for the CAD/CAM method, which is non-significant [ 15 ].…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficiency in brace correction between the traditional plaster mould and the CAD/CAM moulding is not obvious. A better angular in-brace correction was noted with CAD/CAM, but it was not statistically significant [ 14 ]. For Wong the in-brace reduction with the manual method is 0.321 versus 0.419 for the CAD/CAM method, which is non-significant [ 15 ].…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many previous studies support the positive results associated with the casting and Lyon braces [ 14 , 16 , 17 ] but the difficulty and cost of making the plaster cast, administrative economical questions and low compliance, can also explain the reasons which ultimately have prompted the development of new design concepts with immediate in-brace correction. It was only in 2013 that advances in computer technology with the latest generation software (OrtenShape) allowed the superposition of different CAD/CAM moulds and a segmental 3D reconstruction [ 18 , 19 ]. The aim was to use this new software to replace the plaster cast with a new Lyon brace: the ARTbrace.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%