2000
DOI: 10.1006/eesa.2000.1933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Stepwise Procedure for Assessment of the Microbial Respiratory Activity of Soil Samples Contaminated with Organic Compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The respiratory-activation quotient, which illustrates the biomass of dormant or active microorganisms, ranged from 0.17 to 0.49 (Figure 3). As stated by Eisentraeger et al [44], the respiratory-activation quotient value from 0.1 to 0.3 is low and indicates a substantial amount of biomass of dormant microorganisms, as well as slow bioremediation in the presence of potentially toxic substances in the soil. Hence the most desirable for the soil is a high basal respiration value.…”
Section: Effect Of Sewage Sludge Biochars On Soil Microbial Activitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The respiratory-activation quotient, which illustrates the biomass of dormant or active microorganisms, ranged from 0.17 to 0.49 (Figure 3). As stated by Eisentraeger et al [44], the respiratory-activation quotient value from 0.1 to 0.3 is low and indicates a substantial amount of biomass of dormant microorganisms, as well as slow bioremediation in the presence of potentially toxic substances in the soil. Hence the most desirable for the soil is a high basal respiration value.…”
Section: Effect Of Sewage Sludge Biochars On Soil Microbial Activitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The respiratory activity coefficient quotient (QR) determined in the study, which illustrates the number of dormant or active microorganisms, ranged from 0.11 to 0.14 for the LS soil and from 0.11 to 0.22 for the C soil (Table 5). As reported by Eisentraeger et al (2000), a respiratory activity coefficient ranging from 0.1 to 0.3 is low and indicates a large amount of dormant microorganismal biomass as well as a low rate of bioremediation with potential toxic substances in the soil. From this point of view, a high BR value is most desirable for soil.…”
Section: Effect Of the Addition Of Cavitated Charcoal On The Value Ofmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…the exponential slope in the respiration curve as defined in ISO 17155 [24]) started later in the contaminated soil samples at the beginning of incubation. It has been reported that prolonged lag-times may indicate a toxic effect of chemicals on the microbial communities [28][29][30]. The lag-time of microbial respiration (defined as time from substrate addition to start of exponential growth according to ISO 17155 [24]) may also reflect the quality of the previously available carbon source [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%