A strategic measurement framework to monitor and evaluate circularity performance in organizations from a transition perspective

Franco, Nathalia; Almeida, Maria Fatima Ludovico de; Calili, Rodrigo Flora

doi:10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.017

Cited by 37 publications

(50 citation statements)

References 63 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…When leaders become justified about the importance of paying attention to social, the environment, and economics at the same time, and also get the capabilities of a transformational leader; and when all the supply chain members get aligned, now it is the time to set the new business model and a strategic measurement framework to monitor and evaluate the performance [59].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Super SBM Network DEA for Assessing Sustainability Performance of Third-Party Logistics Service Providers Considering Circular Economy Strategies in the Era of Industry 4.0

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Stakeholders are increasingly aware of the aspect of sustainability, and the fact that the circular economy facilitates the achievement of sustainable development goals. They place pressure on supply chains to become sustainable, and for this reason, third-party logistics (3PL) service providers, as specialized professionals, play a vital role in sustainable supply chain management. Although developments in technology in the era of Industry 4.0 have been effective at directing 3PLs along the path towards sustainability, integrated management of forward and reverse logistics systems in order to achieve a circular economy and to become sustainable remains a problem, even in developed countries. However, benchmarking and using the experiences of others can help to speed up this path at a minimal cost. An interval type-2 fuzzy super-slack-based measure network DEA was developed to make such benchmarking possible. Governance style, staff behavior, environmental management systems, and social elements are considered, alongside the principles of the circular economy, in order to compare the sustainability performance of 17 3PLs with respect to different aspects through the application of the developed DEA model. Proper benchmarking with respect to strategies and operations of the 3PLs that are recognized as efficient makes it possible for these 3PLs to overcome obstacles and progress at a lower cost. The results show that 3PLs do not have a comprehensive sustainability strategy that is coordinated with an overall vision of the total supply chain. An investigation into the development of a framework with multiple steps for the guidance of 3PLs, as well as the whole supply chain, towards sustainability in the Industry 4.0 era would be a fruitful next study.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To systematically ensure that commitment to environmental protection improvement exists in the business organizations towards environmental sustainability [47,[58][59][60][61]…”

Section: Environmental Management Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Super SBM Network DEA for Assessing Sustainability Performance of Third-Party Logistics Service Providers Considering Circular Economy Strategies in the Era of Industry 4.0

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This research follows a procedural framework of analysis based on Franco et al (2021) to provide an underlying structure and an approved course of action (Table 1.1). A conceptual research map complements the research design presented below (Figure 2.1).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the proposed model and in previous work (Franco et al, 2021), the selection of C-Indicators in a transition management perspective is conducted with the support of a hybrid approach between Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), considering each R-strategy that could be adopted by one organization and their hierarchal contribution to a circular economy (Potting et al, 2017). However, considering that detailed analysis of several works of literature review on circularity indicators to organizations confirmed that the combination of different MCDM was rarely applied in the C-Indicators selection field, a sensitivity analysis concerning the selection of C-indicators phase's for each R-strategy will be conducted with the support of this ELECTRE I method (Roy, 1968).…”

Section: C-indicators Selection Sensitivity Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Strategic Measurement Model to Monitor and Evaluate Circularity Performance in Organizations From a Transition Perspective

Franco¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Calili, whose expertise was invaluable in formulating the research questions and for choosing a hybrid methodological approach. Both presented me with such rich tools and encouraged me to overcome significant learning challenges. Their insightful feedback pushed me to sharpen my thinking and brought my work to a higher level.To the women who inspired me in my scientific path through sustainability and

show abstract

Attaining Sustainable Development Goals through embedding circular economy principles: Evidence from food processing small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises in India

Ghosh,

Raut,

Cheikhrouhou

et al. 2023

Bus Strat Env

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Various industries are gradually sifting away from the linear economy and toward the circular economy (CE), but its advancement is crawling far behind the environmental contamination by the food processing industry in developing countries. Hardly any research analyzes the CE performance of food processing small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises (FPSMEs) in an emerging economy context. Hence, developing a CE performance evaluation framework is imperative to facilitate this transition. This research proposes a comprehensive framework for evaluating CE performance based on three real‐world cases of Indian FPSMEs. Initially, 15 essential criteria are shortlisted from the literature and refined by the experts. Afterward, data are collected through questionnaires administered to experts and structured interviews. Next, this research employs a multi‐criteria decision‐making (MCDM)–based approach, in which the Criteria Importance Through Inter‐criteria Correlation (CRITIC) method is used to compute the objective weights of criteria and the Vlse Kriterijumska Optimizacija Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) method is used to determine the performances of FPSMEs and rank them accordingly. The results reveal that “investment in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR),” “use of renewable energy,” “increase in scrap recycling rate,” “total emission,” and “total water consumption” are the top five criteria for CE performance. Investment in CSR emerges as the most influential criterion for strategic corporate transformation, which blends the notions of CE and CSR as a feasible solution for designing circular business processes.

show abstract

A strategic measurement framework to monitor and evaluate circularity performance in organizations from a transition perspective

Cited by 37 publications

References 63 publications

Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Super SBM Network DEA for Assessing Sustainability Performance of Third-Party Logistics Service Providers Considering Circular Economy Strategies in the Era of Industry 4.0

Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Super SBM Network DEA for Assessing Sustainability Performance of Third-Party Logistics Service Providers Considering Circular Economy Strategies in the Era of Industry 4.0

A Strategic Measurement Model to Monitor and Evaluate Circularity Performance in Organizations From a Transition Perspective

Attaining Sustainable Development Goals through embedding circular economy principles: Evidence from food processing small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises in India

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About