2000
DOI: 10.1006/abio.2000.4837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Strategy for Identification and Quantitation of Phosphopeptides by Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In-gel Tryptic Digestion and Mass Spectrometry-In-gel tryptic digestion was performed with the previously described procedure (13). The peptides resuspended in 0.1% formic acid were analyzed using a quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer (Esquire 3000 plus, Bruker-Daltonics, Leipzig, Germany) interfaced with a high-pressure liquid chromatograph system (UltiMate, LC Packings, San Francisco, CA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In-gel Tryptic Digestion and Mass Spectrometry-In-gel tryptic digestion was performed with the previously described procedure (13). The peptides resuspended in 0.1% formic acid were analyzed using a quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer (Esquire 3000 plus, Bruker-Daltonics, Leipzig, Germany) interfaced with a high-pressure liquid chromatograph system (UltiMate, LC Packings, San Francisco, CA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Label-free approaches to quantitative proteomics have gained prominence in recent years since no additional chemistry or sample preparation steps are required. These include biostatistical profiling [8,9] in clinical proteomics whereby peptide ions that show intensity changes over many samples are recorded and represent potential protein biomarkers, methods for comparing the ratios of integrated peak areas/intensities of phosphorylated to nonphosphorylated peptide ions between two samples [10,11], a strategy to assess the stoichiometry of phosphorylation sites [12], and the popular method of quantifying protein levels from different samples based on the number of MS/MS spectra that identify the protein of interest (spectral counting) [13][14][15][16][17].We demonstrate a method to survey relative protein quantity between samples that is an extension to the spectral counting technique whereby the average of the TIC for all of the MS/MS spectra that identify a protein is used as a quantitative measure. Each spectral count gets a unique abundance value rather than equivalent values of "1" as with spectral counting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include biostatistical profiling [8,9] in clinical proteomics whereby peptide ions that show intensity changes over many samples are recorded and represent potential protein biomarkers, methods for comparing the ratios of integrated peak areas/intensities of phosphorylated to nonphosphorylated peptide ions between two samples [10,11], a strategy to assess the stoichiometry of phosphorylation sites [12], and the popular method of quantifying protein levels from different samples based on the number of MS/MS spectra that identify the protein of interest (spectral counting) [13][14][15][16][17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few researchers have suggested that a comparison of mass spectrometric signals of phosphorylated peptides with internal controls (i.e., an unmodified peptide derived from the same protein) can provide adequate quantitation. The difference between these reported methods seems to be in the choice of internal standard, and whether it should be the corresponding unphosphorylated peptide [25,26] or a peptide derived from the same protein that does not contain any modifications [27]. Ideally, one would want the internal standard to have physical and chemical properties that are most similar to that of the phosphorylated peptide to be quantitated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%