2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.09.26.461876
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A structural biology community assessment of AlphaFold 2 applications

Abstract: Most proteins fold into 3D structures that determine how they function and orchestrate the biological processes of the cell. Recent developments in computational methods have led to protein structure predictions that have reached the accuracy of experimentally determined models. While this has been independently verified, the implementation of these methods across structural biology applications remains to be tested. Here, we evaluate the use of AlphaFold 2 (AF2) predictions in the study of characteristic stru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
166
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
7
166
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, for a more straightforward interpretation of the results, we set in this study 3 different levels of protein structural coverage according to 3 ranges of sequence identity percentages between a protein and a PDB chain. The ranges are: >95%, which includes the real structure of the protein; 95-50%, which contains useful templates to study the impact of mutations[25]; and 50-20%, which contemplates structural coverage of distant related proteins assuming that structure is more conserved than sequence. With this definition our results show that the current structural coverage of the human proteome is 48% of all human protein residues (Figure 1c) when sequence identity ≥ 20%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, for a more straightforward interpretation of the results, we set in this study 3 different levels of protein structural coverage according to 3 ranges of sequence identity percentages between a protein and a PDB chain. The ranges are: >95%, which includes the real structure of the protein; 95-50%, which contains useful templates to study the impact of mutations[25]; and 50-20%, which contemplates structural coverage of distant related proteins assuming that structure is more conserved than sequence. With this definition our results show that the current structural coverage of the human proteome is 48% of all human protein residues (Figure 1c) when sequence identity ≥ 20%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Residues with 70 > pLDDT ≥ 50 have low confidence, and residues with pLDDT < 50 correspond to very low confidence ( 13 ). It was recently described that very low confidence pLDDT scores correlate with high propensities for intrinsic disorder ( 17 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent reports have utilized AF2 models and existing paradigms to ascertain the potential effect of a mutation without a discernible correlation. 24,25 Here the structures of the mutant protein lead to an increase in disorder or altered conformations. The challenge will be in devising metrics to quantitate and evaluate the effect of the mutation on the structure relative to the wild type structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%