A structured approach to measuring and optimizing the organizational architecture in global product development projects

Abstract

In global product development projects, coordinating complex technical communication among teams across time zones in the overlapping process is a fundamental challenge. To optimize a global product development organization to reduce the negative impact of time separation on coordination, this article presents an innovative approach to solve two key problems: how to quantify the coordination among distributed teams and how to identify efficient global product development organization. We build structural models to capture the coordination dependency strength among global product development teams from the time separation and overlapping process perspectives, employing the design structure matrix method. Then, we analyze the factors that influence synchronous and asynchronous communication due to time separation. We also apply the random walk method to identify a team similarity matrix, taking into account the direct and indirect dependency relationships among teams associated with their performed activities. Finally, we use the team similarity matrix as an input to a spectral clustering algorithm to identify the clustering strategy for the global product development organizational architecture, yielding and reinforcing several managerial insights, including how to analyze the coordination among global product development teams as well as how the offshoring costs impact the clustered organization.

Supporting Sustainable Manufacturing Practices Implementation using Design Structure Matrix in the Algerian Economy

“…(1) where ( , ) S i j , ~( , ) SMP DSM I J are rows normalized to sustainable strategy DSM, Policies DSM, and sustainable manufacturing DSM, respectively. The same methodology was applied in (Kherbachi, Yang, & Khan, 2020).…”

Challenges Of Big-science: A Matrix-based Interface Model To Manage Technical Integration Risks In Multi-organizational Engineering Projects

“…actors work for different companies at different locations, possibly in different countries), it takes more effort to come to an agreement. Distributed actors have infrequent communication and different digital infrastructures or may speak in different languages from different time zones (Yang et al, 2015;Kherbachi et al 2020). Once such practical organizational barriers are overcome, actors still have to deal with conflicting technical or budgetary interests.…”

“…The problem is that ITER can only achieve its mission if all partners align their design decisions with their neighbors (Sosa, 2007). However, inter-organizational barriers, limited communication channels and conflicting objectives can inhibit the collaborative design processes (Kherbachi et al 2020).…”

R&D roadmap for process robotization driven to the digital transformation of the industry 4.0

“…Thus, when the product development is performed in CE approach, the costs related to the modification due to the difficulties in manufacturing phase can be avoided during the conception/design phases (Boothroyd, 1994; Prasad et al, 1998; Stjepandić et al, 2015) to support the company performance and its proposal faced to the competitors (Milana et al, 2014). Some recent works bring contributions related to CE for application in production development environment and its benefits for industrial environments (Barbosa and de Andrade Bezerra, 2019; Dellagi et al, 2020; Estorillio and Simiao, 2006; Kherbachi et al, 2020; Putnik and Putnik, 2019; Stjepandić et al, 2015).…”